GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"I have information on compression formats:"

The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Tue 14/05/02 at 20:15
Regular
Posts: 787
Revise for important GCSEs or run lots of compression algorithms? Easy decision, really. So:

The target was a 19mb MP3 file, by Iron Maiden. Very good. 192kbps. I ran it through all the compression formats I had, and here are the results. All filesizes in bytes.

18536 foo.tar
18528 foo.mp3
18384 foo.tar.gz
18384 foo.zip
18364 foo.rar
18328 foo.bz2
18328 foo.tar.bz2

So, tar actually made it bigger, tar.bzip2 and bzip2 produced the same sizes, rar came second, followed by zip and the famous gzip.

The quickest was tar, followed by gzip, then zip, bzip2 and finally rar, which took for-bloody-ever. However, both zip and bzip2 took fair amounts of time each.
Tue 14/05/02 at 20:40
Posts: 0
Rob...

Tar doesn't even claim to be a compression algorithm. It isn't meant to be.

It was originally designed to turn a series of files into one file, in a way that could be easily extracted. That's why Tar and Gzip are two seperate steps to create a "Tarball" or .tar.gz/.tgz.

The main use of creating these files was backup. You can dd a .tar to a tape device easily, but piping loads of individual files is more hassle.. and getting them back as individual files is even worse. Remember, a tape device is just a long string of 8-bit ascii.

And of course Tar is going to increase the filesize -- there's a header involved, and no compression. And of course huffman compression is hardly going to touch it.. it's an MP3 :)
Tue 14/05/02 at 20:19
Regular
"Eff, you see, kay?"
Posts: 14,156
Pardon?
Tue 14/05/02 at 20:18
Regular
"Pouch Ape"
Posts: 14,499
Why don't you just...ahhh, it's not worth it.
Tue 14/05/02 at 20:15
Regular
"Eff, you see, kay?"
Posts: 14,156
Revise for important GCSEs or run lots of compression algorithms? Easy decision, really. So:

The target was a 19mb MP3 file, by Iron Maiden. Very good. 192kbps. I ran it through all the compression formats I had, and here are the results. All filesizes in bytes.

18536 foo.tar
18528 foo.mp3
18384 foo.tar.gz
18384 foo.zip
18364 foo.rar
18328 foo.bz2
18328 foo.tar.bz2

So, tar actually made it bigger, tar.bzip2 and bzip2 produced the same sizes, rar came second, followed by zip and the famous gzip.

The quickest was tar, followed by gzip, then zip, bzip2 and finally rar, which took for-bloody-ever. However, both zip and bzip2 took fair amounts of time each.

Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

Thanks!
Thank you for dealing with this so promptly it's nice having a service provider that offers a good service, rare to find nowadays.
Very pleased
Very pleased with the help given by your staff. They explained technical details in an easy way and were patient when providing information to a non expert like me.

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.