Viewing Thread:
"Was GT2 better than GT3?"

I think that GT2 was better than GT3 because I think there was more cars and different things to do. The graphics are better on GT3,as you would expect with the power of the playstation 2 but I just think GT2 had more depth to the game.

GT3 rules GT2. Something I can't understand about people is they complain that the number of cars has decreased from GT2. There where too many in the first place, so I don't mind if a few have been taken away for the second sequel.

The handling in GT3 is far better than 2, since the developers spent more time getting the real car physics just right in the game. All the cars handle differently to one another.

Plus the graphics in GT3 are amazing, they really show off the power of the PS2. All in all, I think GT3 is the best of the series yet.

I disliked the fact that there were all those competitions within each manufacturer. I mean, you had to go to every place in town... Honda, Toyota... the lot, and enter all their individual championships, usually requiring a whole new car each time, which was a bit of a drag.

With GT3, the championships are organised better, and there are far less car specific championships.

With this in mind, and the graphical supremacy, and handling tweaks, GT3 is my favourite.

never, the whole idea of releasing sequals to games is to make them better, take GTA and Metal Gear Solid as examples

I think that GT2 was better than GT3 because I think there was more cars and different things to do. The graphics are better on GT3,as you would expect with the power of the playstation 2 but I just think GT2 had more depth to the game.