The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
is this really the best that thq could do? this really was dissapointing. Don't get me wrong i have got the game and also my friend played on it and was convinced to buy a copy even though he doesn't like wrestling. I thought it would be a bit harder. Better story mode. More characters. Look a bit better (likes good already). I just thought that this was almost the same as smackdown 2. The game overall i thought was ok but i was wondering where u wanting ur money back? did it surprise you in the mtach stipulations there are quite alot. I love the hell in a cell ( 6 men). This could be better if it had a different grapple technique don't u think? please reply because i wanted to know if this game was as good as it was hyped up to be or was it just a con!
burton wrote:
> the other thing about this game is that it is incredibly slow. I
> thought that because it was going to be on a faster console it would
> be faster itself.
I wouldnt say slow at any time i would say realistic, the best interpretation of thee wwf yet, you do a match in sm 2, you look at the graphics and you will notice how unrealisticly fast they move, it was almost impossible for me to beat my younger buttoon it was a match of the bent trigger fingers.
It seems you were not looking for realism but A GT version of wrestling, the right direction is realism, not makining it faster because the console is, it just means that frame rate is better which really stands out in sm2.
Not being able to own every title which is completely impossible in the real world, the aim should be to do more what is possible in reality, and make it good.
> the other thing about this game is that it is incredibly slow. I
> thought that because it was going to be on a faster console it would
> be faster itself.
I wouldnt say slow at any time i would say realistic, the best interpretation of thee wwf yet, you do a match in sm 2, you look at the graphics and you will notice how unrealisticly fast they move, it was almost impossible for me to beat my younger buttoon it was a match of the bent trigger fingers.
It seems you were not looking for realism but A GT version of wrestling, the right direction is realism, not makining it faster because the console is, it just means that frame rate is better which really stands out in sm2.
Not being able to own every title which is completely impossible in the real world, the aim should be to do more what is possible in reality, and make it good.
the other thing about this game is that it is incredibly slow. I thought that because it was going to be on a faster console it would be faster itself. I wasn't too impressed with the sounds either but what i did like was the create wrestle, stable and a taunt so this was good. i liked the way the crowd looked it didn't look to shabby (like no mercy).
is this really the best that thq could do? this really was dissapointing. Don't get me wrong i have got the game and also my friend played on it and was convinced to buy a copy even though he doesn't like wrestling. I thought it would be a bit harder. Better story mode. More characters. Look a bit better (likes good already). I just thought that this was almost the same as smackdown 2. The game overall i thought was ok but i was wondering where u wanting ur money back? did it surprise you in the mtach stipulations there are quite alot. I love the hell in a cell ( 6 men). This could be better if it had a different grapple technique don't u think? please reply because i wanted to know if this game was as good as it was hyped up to be or was it just a con!