The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Well the PS2 have Agent Under Fire, but does the console need more, and as good as Goldeneye? YES!
I agree with Flying Hawkstar. Apart from the cool driving missions, I found the game on the whole a bit dissapointing.
The graphics are awesome, but the level design is pretty basic. There isn't enough in the way of exploration or puzzle solving either, something which Half Life did and succeeded years ago. The game is also short, and doesn't really have much in the way of replay value.
To have make the game better, EA should have looked at other FPS like Half life and the origanal Goldeneye to see how to make a great FPS, instead they've left us with a good looking but shallow first person shooter.
The graphics are awesome, but the level design is pretty basic. There isn't enough in the way of exploration or puzzle solving either, something which Half Life did and succeeded years ago. The game is also short, and doesn't really have much in the way of replay value.
To have make the game better, EA should have looked at other FPS like Half life and the origanal Goldeneye to see how to make a great FPS, instead they've left us with a good looking but shallow first person shooter.
I don't think that Agent Under Fire was very good apart from the Trip Mines and the Claw thing it didn't seem very good why does everyone like it so much.
we want many cool game to come out.