Viewing Thread:
"Whos the best at Bond games. Rare or E.A?"

Its got to be rare! How on earth did they loose their lisence to E.A. Alright Twine was ok but it was nowhere near as good as goldeneye! if we want a decent bond game for gamecube were gonna have to wait untill the new film has come out and maybe rare might win back the license. all credit to E.A, there well good at sport sims. ive always loved the fifa sereis and their are plenty other good E.A sport games out there. i dunno what do you think?

I like the way it tastes.

I can still hear the screaming.

Seinfeld_Enthusiast wrote:
> I'm sorry- are we seriously 'debating' who makes better Bond games?
> It's so obvious it's like starting a topic saying "So, What Do
> You Like About Oxygen?"

The way it burns.

does anyone hear know any poster that has been reported for an abusive chat message? I just went into the wwf chat room and told them all that WWf was for blokes taht had been pumped up on streoids and like dancind around wearing y fronts. oh and that they still live with their mothers!

No, I did read the previous posts and noted the ambivalence of some posters, but I cannot believe that it is worthy of debate. There's always some people that buck the trend- they might prefer a more driving-intensive Bond game, for example, but the debate wasn't "Does anyone like EA Bond games?", it was who's better, and for me, that's a redundant question.

seinfield said:
>I'm sorry- are we seriously 'debating' who makes better Bond games? It's >so obvious it's like starting a topic saying "So, What Do You Like About >Oxygen?" And there'll still be some fool saying, "Well, I think oxygen's >overrated, it's only the reason I'm alive." So in response to >the 'question', I'm assuming it's either rhetorical or written in jest. >It simply cannot be a proper question.

so I take it you think E.A make the better bond games then?

Seinfield you might not have read the rest of the chatroom cos some people think E.A are good at it!

course the majority of us like rae but I jus twanted to know what every body thought. some people might have good reasons for prefering E.A!

Oh dear, it's just too late for this rhetorical psychological stuff!!

I'm sorry- are we seriously 'debating' who makes better Bond games? It's so obvious it's like starting a topic saying "So, What Do You Like About Oxygen?" And there'll still be some fool saying, "Well, I think oxygen's overrated, it's only the reason I'm alive." So in response to the 'question', I'm assuming it's either rhetorical or written in jest. It simply cannot be a proper question.

GpotterUK wrote:
> Two words:
>
> Goldeneye, Rare

3 More:

GPotter talks sense!

Two words:

Goldeneye, Rare

Rare make better games than EA. Full stop.