The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Ok why?
Tell me why, that's all.
Because of the protestations of a red-faced screaming child?
That's fair.
I defend myself against the spurious screams of spakkers and I end up banned?
How the hell is that right?
You a***-faced weasal Snuggly
Tell me why, that's all.
Because of the protestations of a red-faced screaming child?
That's fair.
I defend myself against the spurious screams of spakkers and I end up banned?
How the hell is that right?
You a***-faced weasal Snuggly
Page:
Mendax Bartender wrote:
> Omnia iam fient fieri quae posse negabam.
I studied Latin briefly at school. I think this translates as:
"For all that I am, fiery and fluent, this doesn't mean I can't flame and spam."
I admit that Latin is all Greek to me.
> Omnia iam fient fieri quae posse negabam.
I studied Latin briefly at school. I think this translates as:
"For all that I am, fiery and fluent, this doesn't mean I can't flame and spam."
I admit that Latin is all Greek to me.
Mendax Bartender wrote:
> Omnia iam fient fieri quae posse negabam.
>
> AND SO, DESPERATE SITUATIONS CALL FOR DESPERATE MEASURES.
If you read it backwards, it says "Mendax Bartender is a latin-speaking fool" give or take a few letters.
> Omnia iam fient fieri quae posse negabam.
>
> AND SO, DESPERATE SITUATIONS CALL FOR DESPERATE MEASURES.
If you read it backwards, it says "Mendax Bartender is a latin-speaking fool" give or take a few letters.
loki wrote:
> Mr.Snuggly wrote:
> You know why you were banned, because we have to show the rules are
> the same for everyone.
>
> Except Mystique obviously :-p
*****
Damn right!
> Mr.Snuggly wrote:
> You know why you were banned, because we have to show the rules are
> the same for everyone.
>
> Except Mystique obviously :-p
*****
Damn right!
Baws
er-no wrote:
. I don't know why Goatboy was banned, but
> never before has he sworn or done anything that is over harsh, if its
> him having a rant, its because he sees it fit to have a rant... and
> its normally justified.
It's apparantly what he wrote in Drunk Cows I won Gad post.
Damned if I can see anything ban worthy in there - Hey ho !
. I don't know why Goatboy was banned, but
> never before has he sworn or done anything that is over harsh, if its
> him having a rant, its because he sees it fit to have a rant... and
> its normally justified.
It's apparantly what he wrote in Drunk Cows I won Gad post.
Damned if I can see anything ban worthy in there - Hey ho !
Omnia iam fient fieri quae posse negabam.
AND SO, DESPERATE SITUATIONS CALL FOR DESPERATE MEASURES.
AND SO, DESPERATE SITUATIONS CALL FOR DESPERATE MEASURES.
Now the Sheep is gone?!
Damn.
Damn.
Now SHEEPY?
*Faints*
*Faints*
SHEEPY wrote:
> If the rules are the same for eveyrone
>
> Many more people should be banned, including me probably.
The rules are never the same for everyone, mainly because the judge's mood is always different. I don't know why Goatboy was banned, but never before has he sworn or done anything that is over harsh, if its him having a rant, its because he sees it fit to have a rant... and its normally justified.
> If the rules are the same for eveyrone
>
> Many more people should be banned, including me probably.
The rules are never the same for everyone, mainly because the judge's mood is always different. I don't know why Goatboy was banned, but never before has he sworn or done anything that is over harsh, if its him having a rant, its because he sees it fit to have a rant... and its normally justified.
Dum de Dum
Fun eh?
Fun eh?
Page: