The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
MOUNEY?????
go live in the USA. Please. You will fit right in.
Cruel twist of fate.
> What makes it worse is now I actually have the funds to buy a lot more
> games then before .... trouble is, I don't have much interest in them
> anymore. Whereas before, I was all 'I want this this, that and this',
> but didn't have the cash for this, let alone this and that.
>
> Cruel twist of fate.
we always want what we cant have
> I hate it when I see possibly the best game ever and I go to by it but
> then it hits me: I NEED MOUNEY!!!!
You need MOUNEY? Most of us use money for games, but back onto the subject...
> I don`t think that its nice to make
> people pay that mutch for games and I know that some of you think the
> same way!
Why? Deveopers are people too, and they need to make some money to take home for the kids don't they? I don't care how much a game costs (as long as it isn't stupidly over priced in the £70 region) just as long as it enjoyable and lasts me long enough.
If games cost around £20, the quality would be lower because developers would have to sped less time on it to keep the labour costs down. High Prices = High Quality of Games.
>High Prices = High Quality of Games.
That's bollards.
Have you had a look at some of the games out there? Army Men. Tomb Raider 75, Gran Turismo 98 - all over hyped rubbish games - not worth £45.
> Tribute wrote:
> >High Prices = High Quality of Games.
>
>
> That's bollards.
>
> Have you had a look at some of the games out there? Army Men. Tomb
> Raider 75, Gran Turismo 98 - all over hyped rubbish games - not worth
> £45.
Yes, but if these had retailed at £20 they'd had been even worse because development time would have to be halved to make sure that the company still yeilded a profit from them. I know not every game out there is top quality and most of the aren't. That is all I am saying.