Viewing Thread:
"Have We Gone Too Far?"

I have heard that there is a new project being developed by Sony called Liquid Fire. This new piece of hardware will allow users to control the character with ones arms and legs. It will be a kind of virtual reality world which sounds amazing but sometimes I wonder if we have gone too far. Not just on this but many other things.
I fear thousands and thousands of people will disagree with me when I say that there are so many good stories from previous games ( the original Mario titles and many others.) The reason this fails whenever people try it is they add too much.
For instance its a great idea adding loads of extra puzzles and stuff to Resident Evil for Game Cube but this silly idea of more characters and all that blah.
However the one bit I liked was the giant sharks ( petrifying!) whereas the zombie dogs- which looked scary in the original title- are now so amazingly and utterly apalling they are a disgrace to modern graphics. In other words they suck. If you find this is turning into a review of Resident Evil. Don't worry becuase I know.
I feel that if we take things too fast we will end up with amazing virtual reality stuff and other hi-tech techno crap and a bunch of game writers that would shame even the writers of games such as Mary Kate and Ashley: Winners Circle feel somewhat ashamed of other ' mediocre' writers.
Finally we are using crap techniques like cell shading.

Hope you enjoyed this.
Yours Sincerely
Corporal Reddles.

In case anyone hasn't noticed I've changed my name to Don Reddles!

Why isn't anyone posting in here anymore? :o(

Rabbit<>K wrote:
> cell shading gives a new experience to a hobby which at times is
> repetitive plus the 2d games now have PERFECT graphics

Yes but you have to admit when they mess it up it looks really corny.

cell shading gives a new experience to a hobby which at times is repetitive plus the 2d games now have PERFECT graphics

Kyz22 wrote:
> Finally we are using crap techniques like cell shading.
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> I agree with that

Yeah, why on earth are we using techniques like cel shading. I mean we have harnessed the complete power of amazing 3D graphics and yet we are trying to make things 2D and cartoony. I just don't understand. Please reply if you agree.

Robin wrote:
> well i think its great, virtuall reality, i for sure would go out and
> buy one when they come out, oh wait its made by microsof so it will
> prob cost a bomb.
>
> but i still think that it is a great idear.

By the way it's being made by Sony so it will still probably cost a bomb so err... well... I might buy it!

Robin wrote:
> but i still think that it is a great idear.

Im no genius, but since when did "idea" spawn an "r" into the end?

well i think its great, virtuall reality, i for sure would go out and buy one when they come out, oh wait its made by microsof so it will prob cost a bomb.

but i still think that it is a great idear.

That was enjoyful and it also sound great, I hope they do as it will rule.

Finally we are using crap techniques like cell shading.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

I agree with that