The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Do you think that NGC would have given Starfox Adventures a higher score? I've always agreed on their reviews so far but the SFA review seemed overly harsh. i mean, 72%!? That's territory for Golf sims and Titus, not the supposed best-company-after-Nintendo.
What do you guys think?
What do you guys think?
We'll just have to wait until 22 November to find out.
yes. i prefer edges marking system (it actually makes sense) and 6 is above average, so it isnt terrible
just because man united are good doesnt meen they will always be on top form. NGC arent whiny children like nom used to be (eg grey station poo)
and they gave decent reasons to defend their bold startement. its too linear, most game is spent walking uselessly. Far too easy. tricky tells you most things and if you thought navi was annoying wait untyil you hear his voice;) and the fact that you dont have to solve puzzles, just run through them
and they gave decent reasons to defend their bold startement. its too linear, most game is spent walking uselessly. Far too easy. tricky tells you most things and if you thought navi was annoying wait untyil you hear his voice;) and the fact that you dont have to solve puzzles, just run through them
Remember, Six out of Ten from Edge. And besides, 74% is a very good score by itself, although to NGC and NOM it probably has to be up there in the nineties to be considered good.
Do you think that NGC would have given Starfox Adventures a higher score? I've always agreed on their reviews so far but the SFA review seemed overly harsh. i mean, 72%!? That's territory for Golf sims and Titus, not the supposed best-company-after-Nintendo.
What do you guys think?
What do you guys think?