Viewing Thread:
"its not the size that counts"

I git this off a friend..... anyway its just not the size of a game that counts there is other things that make games brill....like if it has good internet gaming. Wots your views people?

I agree if a games longer the better it is in some cases for example GTA3 you dont have to play the missions you can just kill everyone in sight and have endless hours of fun :)

and do you like the name of my topic?

I reckon I have spent well over 200+ hours on GT3 for my forty pound - thats around 20p per hour, value eh !

That actually might not have been so bad if the price was somewhat lower, but as it is you'd be paying over £10 an hour for 4 hours!!!

I bought GTA: Vice for £40, and I'm not even quater of the way through it yet, so in actual fact I'd say size does matter in a game, if not the actual game, then most certainly the price.

Check out the Lord of The Rings Twin Towers post in the PS2 forum, forty five pound on a game ... completed in 4 hours !

I 'think' I understand what you're talking about, but I do think size does matter, well in most cases it does.

I don't mind short games, short games with replay value that is, but in most cases I've been put off spending £30 on a game because I've been told it would be completed in a matter of days.

I don't really find it value for money spending so much money on something which would keep me entertained for a day or two, no matter how fun or well made the game might be. I'd rather just watch TV for a couple of nights and save my money.

I git this off a friend..... anyway its just not the size of a game that counts there is other things that make games brill....like if it has good internet gaming. Wots your views people?