Viewing Thread:
"0-0 doesn't mean boring"

i watched a great match tonight, even if Rovers were playing. ellington should have had a hat-trick, and howie pulled off some vital saves at the other end. Foster had a ball cleared off the line which ellington should have finished, 2 penaltys turned down and heres the great bit, Lewis Hogg had a punch-up with half of the Carlisle team. To top it all off the ref was spot on, hard to find that in division 3 these days. So although it was 0-0, Rovers deserved to win 2-1.

Solskjær_24 wrote:
> Was the United - Bayern match boring????
Ok, the first half was, but the second
> was more alive and interesting.

It was more 'frustrating' than boring.

i watched that match and it was boring 2 or 3 chances for each team the rest was just pass pass tackle pass etc

I think that the classic 'One-nil to the Ar-se-nal' matches are way more boring than a 0-0!

0-0 may not mean a boring match, but a 1-0 at Anfield most certainly does

i agree, it doesnt mean it was boring, just frustrating, or relieving, depending on what result you need.

Was the United - Bayern match boring????
Ok, the first half was, but the second was more alive and interesting.

It was more 'frustrating' than boring.

I agree it doesn't mean it is boring some people could be sent off etc just because it is 0-0 it doesn't mean it is boring

i watched a great match tonight, even if Rovers were playing. ellington should have had a hat-trick, and howie pulled off some vital saves at the other end. Foster had a ball cleared off the line which ellington should have finished, 2 penaltys turned down and heres the great bit, Lewis Hogg had a punch-up with half of the Carlisle team. To top it all off the ref was spot on, hard to find that in division 3 these days. So although it was 0-0, Rovers deserved to win 2-1.