The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Well to get the facts right that GTA: VC is not number 4 it is number 5.
the list:
1. GTA
2. GTA2
3. GTA: London 1969
4. GTA3
5. GTA: Vice City
So there is the list in ORDER.
the list:
1. GTA
2. GTA2
3. GTA: London 1969
4. GTA3
5. GTA: Vice City
So there is the list in ORDER.
J-$@V0 wrote:
> Well to get the facts right that GTA: VC is not number 4 it is number
> 5.
>
> the list:
>
> 1. GTA
> 2. GTA2
> 3. GTA: London 1969
> 4. GTA3
> 5. GTA: Vice City
>
>
> So there is the list in ORDER.
heh, I got GTA2 on release and I already had GTA london so meh!
> Well to get the facts right that GTA: VC is not number 4 it is number
> 5.
>
> the list:
>
> 1. GTA
> 2. GTA2
> 3. GTA: London 1969
> 4. GTA3
> 5. GTA: Vice City
>
>
> So there is the list in ORDER.
heh, I got GTA2 on release and I already had GTA london so meh!
And the point of this thread is what?
Ah, yeah that's it. To make the author look like a complete gimp.
Mission accomplished I reckon.
Ah, yeah that's it. To make the author look like a complete gimp.
Mission accomplished I reckon.
London was made into a stand alone game as well.
London was an expansion pack, however when I heard "GTA Vice City - I thought it would be an expansion pack.
OK then.q
Stop talking crap. Its the fourth actual game where as others would have been expansions. :)
Well to get the facts right that GTA: VC is not number 4 it is number 5.
the list:
1. GTA
2. GTA2
3. GTA: London 1969
4. GTA3
5. GTA: Vice City
So there is the list in ORDER.
the list:
1. GTA
2. GTA2
3. GTA: London 1969
4. GTA3
5. GTA: Vice City
So there is the list in ORDER.