Viewing Thread:
"Spank me, I've been a naughty monkey!!!"

I've broken almost every rule in the web design book of common sense by using a frameset within a frameset, layers to position the content and a huge chunking image for the background. Yet it rocks! I made a site for my uni course and you can check it here and tel me what you think:
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/paul.whiston/musictech
Beware!

There all nancy Mozilla users (he says hiding his copy), bloody linuxy people, why couldnt they just use the same stuff as IE?

I'm actually amazed that it works so far in Nutsack Navigator.

OK, OK. The Layers are dodgy, it uses frames!! So what! It's the only way I could get it to do what I wanted it to do! What if I sorted the huge pic, mad it one file and used tables? Would you lot be happy then?

Er, nested framesets? Layers? The fact that ot looks 100% second-rate in anything that isn't Internet Exploder?

It's not horribly designed!!! The only bad thing is the loading time - which I'm working on. *fumes* stop making stupid comments *fumes*

> It's for exclusive use at Uni. Where they have Windows. With Internet Explorer. And a huge bandwidth. Geddit?!

No excuse to make a horribly designed site :)

Although seriously.. it looks like it has potential.

Nice site MM, but it takes some time to load (about 30-40 seconds on my 56k modem). I like the look of it - very abstract! :0)

Yep, except there's a huge pic in a layer behind the whole thing that might take about 10/20 seconds to load. That is unless the layers have screwed up in your browser.

Let me say it for the last time:

It's for exclusive use at Uni. Where they have Windows. With Internet Explorer. And a huge bandwidth. Geddit?!

http://luke.ac6.org/turbonutter/stuff/screenshot20020308133453.png

Is that what it's supposed to look like?

Sorry, I thought you said 'What's a Mackie?'.