Viewing Thread:
"Interstellar travel. Fancy it?"

Ok, this is an article taken from www.telegraph.co.uk.

It's a bit long, so I'm going to put it in the next post, so it's not on the same page twice.

Bacially, I think it's quite interesing, but I don't really understand *all* of the technical details.

It's certaonly interesting that NASA is at least taking it seriously, but a multi-generation journy?

You start off on it, knowing that you'll die before you get there? That you'll die on the spaceship, away from the majority of your friends and family? No thanks.

But maybe you think differently?

Have a read and let me know.

Ok thanks. And sorry for being angry-I was having a terrible day. I would really like to see some customization in this game

Is that what you are angry about? The guide for character modding will be up this month. There won't be a guide to making dungeon themes, I've never said there would be, as it's a little too complex for a guide.

last year didn't you say that you would make a tutorial on how to make quests and dungeons and things like that?

I'm very sorry that you are disappointed with your purchase. I do provide a thorough demo so that players can get a good feel for what the game is before buying. Do you feel that you were misled about the games content? What were you expecting from the game that isn't present?

If you bought the game direct from hackslashloot.com then email me([email protected]) and I'll sort you out a full refund. If you bought the game from elsewhere then you'll need to contact that vender for a refund.

I bought this game for real moneys. I am angry because I do not feel like it was worth it. Please update it to make it worth playing, and worth making other people want to play it with or beside me.

The links do make some interesting reading, but all of the points raised are addressed in the book, with equally convincing arguments.

Blimey.

This thread certainly took a bit of a twist from how it started. All interesting stuff though.

Now I just need some time to look at all the links that have been posted...

But people do argue against the facts, because there are scientific facts that say otherwise.

Far from end of story as far as I and millions of others are concerned.

Yes but the basic arguments are all false and the logic is circular - as all these sites point out. You cannot argue against many of the counter claims these sites make because they are actual facts, and the site that demonstrates the lighting effects again is actual real photo's shwoing real evidence. We went to the moon, end of story.

Yes, all of the issues on those sites are covered in detail in the book, as are the general explanations provided on those websites. However the book goes into further detail regarding the lighting of each photo than the website, with testimony from some of the largest photographic ompanies in the world who actually supplied equipment for the mission - people who have nothing to gain whether the landing was faked or not.

It's interesting that you choose only to believe those experts who support your beliefs and dismiss all others, though.

There's no way I can cover the entire book here (obviously), so we'll have to agree to differ. For me personally, though, I still see more evidence against than for.