The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Everyone is going on about the notable elction, but it hasn't even been announced yet.
I'm sure that Tonty normally mentions it about a couple of weeks before.
So far..... nothing.
So maybe there won't be an election. Afterall, there are a few notables already, and if you have too many, it makes the title worthless.
Just a thought...
I'm sure that Tonty normally mentions it about a couple of weeks before.
So far..... nothing.
So maybe there won't be an election. Afterall, there are a few notables already, and if you have too many, it makes the title worthless.
Just a thought...
Page:
I mentioned this last election to Tony and he said that Notables would always keep their title, once a notable always a notable.
Also no plans to stop the election from happening either.
Also no plans to stop the election from happening either.
So we could vote out Sniper? Excellent.
Tart :-)
Tart :-)
Pleash excushe the typosh in my lashed posht.
We've got 11 Notables at present. I reckon they should draw the line at 12. So if they vote in two more this election (making 13), then one of the original ones has to step down to make way for the new incumbents of ye golden title.
That way, as will as a vote FOR a Notable thread every 3 montsh, we could have a vote AGAINST a Notable thread every 3 months, just to make things really interesting and wipe the smug grins of the current Notables who sit pretty in the knowledge that their title is for life, not just for Christmas.
No, wait...
That way, as will as a vote FOR a Notable thread every 3 montsh, we could have a vote AGAINST a Notable thread every 3 months, just to make things really interesting and wipe the smug grins of the current Notables who sit pretty in the knowledge that their title is for life, not just for Christmas.
No, wait...
Too many notables eh?
Throw out Sniper.
I'm joking...
Throw out Sniper.
I'm joking...
Your Honour wrote:
> Very well thanks.
Well, kind of. I'm being dragged to watch Oceans Eleven
> tonight, by the other half.
>I really don't want to watch that film...
You'll be happy you've seen it, trust me.
> Very well thanks.
Well, kind of. I'm being dragged to watch Oceans Eleven
> tonight, by the other half.
>I really don't want to watch that film...
You'll be happy you've seen it, trust me.
Yeah, Oceans 11 was really cool. You'd like it, YH...
Your Honour wrote:
> Very well thanks.
Well, kind of. I'm being dragged to watch Oceans Eleven
> tonight, by the other half.
>I really don't want to watch that film...
Yes you do. Trust me on this.
> Very well thanks.
Well, kind of. I'm being dragged to watch Oceans Eleven
> tonight, by the other half.
>I really don't want to watch that film...
Yes you do. Trust me on this.
AliBoy wrote:
Like the tagline GH, JAVA that boring then I guess?
Just after spending so long learning C its damn hard to get your head around Object Orientated Stuff. Hardest part is learning whats already provided in the libraries for you
Like the tagline GH, JAVA that boring then I guess?
Just after spending so long learning C its damn hard to get your head around Object Orientated Stuff. Hardest part is learning whats already provided in the libraries for you
I hope the elections are soon. All this notable talk is making people act odd.
Like the tagline GH, JAVA that boring then I guess?
Like the tagline GH, JAVA that boring then I guess?
Page: