Viewing Thread:
"Chris Jericho Vs Kurt angle at Wrestlemania Huge Argument topic"

Yey.

Before I get started this is not to turn into a rivalry. It is merely a bit of fun and some points to be put forward. Please respect everyone's points unless they say jericho vs angle at Wresltmania:D. No only kidding.

So, Ant and cong man really want to see Jericho and Angle at Wrestlemania. I am totally against this as I hate them. Jericho especially.

So Arguments for Jericho/Angle and arguments against aginst Jericho/Angle.

I'll think of a huge post soon.

No being nasty and if it gets to heated i'll scrap it.

Friends???

Angle and Jericho are the top two wrestlers currently at main event level in the WWF.

Thats my view.

2 faces can be good as well Austin Vs Rock at last years WrestleMania although there match at WrestleMania 1999 was better.

Matches between two heels are very interesting, because either they'll both cheat, or neither will!

Remember HHH vs Angle at Royal Rumble 2001?? Great match, was ruined by Austin's interference.

Two heels against each-other are great, as everything's a little different. Jericho vs Angle would've been cool. Damn.

Scott Giles wrote:
> Now this argument, i don't see the point in starting it really (don't mean to
> take offense at anyone) because straight after No Way Out, Triple H got a
> rematch against Kurt Angle to try and regain his Wrestlemania shot and he wins
> so.......

What we on about Angle vs Jericho for?


We don't know about that at least some people gave a spoiler warning. There was a whole argument about it. I don't care about it really but people who watch Raw on Friday probably will.

dont know whether some one has said this already but if iot is Kurt Angle Vs Chris Jericho then one of them will turn face just before or it will just be a match that no one cares about because they will both be heels.

Yeah, Angle and Jericho is a crap match that we won't be seeing.

Well it may not have been crap, but from the way both of them have been performing, it would have. They haven't been performing 'bad' in a way that they don't deserve to be in a main event, but 'bad' as in the bad when they are so cowardly the only way they can actually compete in a match is when they are having the living hell kicked out of them.

But, it's not happening anyway, so I don't have to have any more heart attacks. :D

Now this argument, i don't see the point in starting it really (don't mean to take offense at anyone) because straight after No Way Out, Triple H got a rematch against Kurt Angle to try and regain his Wrestlemania shot and he wins so.......

What we on about Angle vs Jericho for?

†hë_Çøñg_Mðñ wrote:
> Bah bah bah and once again bah. How can you say Kurt Angle doesn't get heat with
> the fans? They chant you suck all the way through his entry music and What? all
> the way through his promos. As for criticising Jericho for not getting the fans
> going, this is not the heel's job, it is the faces job. Now Chris Jericho has
> had his big heel push he will eventually turn back to a face and be able to win
> the big matches cleanly. This is how the WWF pushes virtually any superstar from
> upper-card to the top of the card. I have to say I find the new Jerciho very
> amusing the way he hams up his over-inflated ego is funny. Wheras 'What?' is
> getting a bit dull and as for criticisng Jericho for still having the same act
> he had two years ahgo, well don't even get me srtarted on how long the Rock has
> been using the same tired old catchphrases.

Jericho is the only man to have
> won every title the WWF has to offer. The WWF must feel he is good enough or
> they wouldn't have made his the first undisputed champion. 'Nuff Said.

I mean he only gets heat in promos and they only chant you suck well because he does. Also if you think Jericho deserves to be a Grand Slam winner your gay! Now that should get some heat going! :D (only joking Cong man)

AfroJoe wrote:
> Desert Beetle wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
> Desert Beetle. You are a fool.
> For 2 different
> reasons.

I'm a fool am I? Considering you're the one
> complaining that you
> couldn't see my spoiler warning, even though I put
> one, I beg to differ. If you
> put it in an "unspoilerish" way,
> then fine, it's not for me to
> comment, even though you do that yourself,
> which is ignorance. If people read
> it, it's their own fault for two
> reasons:

a) Skimming my post and not
> noticing the warning
b) Not
> noticing the warning at all

I don't want to
> argue with you, but please
> don't call me a fool. I will make a bigger spoiler
> warning in future if
> that would please you.

-----

Hey, don't worry.

I'm not a serious
> person.

But just make your spoilers more clear from now on.

Anyway, I'm
> not compaining, but other people would be if they saw it. I know what happened
> on RAW, but as I said, some other people didn't.

Ok, sure thing Joe.

Desert Beetle wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
> Desert Beetle. You are a fool. For 2 different
> reasons.

I'm a fool am I? Considering you're the one complaining that you
> couldn't see my spoiler warning, even though I put one, I beg to differ. If you
> put it in an "unspoilerish" way, then fine, it's not for me to
> comment, even though you do that yourself, which is ignorance. If people read
> it, it's their own fault for two reasons:

a) Skimming my post and not
> noticing the warning
b) Not noticing the warning at all

I don't want to
> argue with you, but please don't call me a fool. I will make a bigger spoiler
> warning in future if that would please you.

-----

Hey, don't worry.

I'm not a serious person.

But just make your spoilers more clear from now on.

Anyway, I'm not compaining, but other people would be if they saw it. I know what happened on RAW, but as I said, some other people didn't.