Viewing Thread:
"The Gamecube Graphics"

Who cares about the graphics? Its the gameplay that matters, and some companies dont have the same kind of funding as others so obviously they are'nt gonna be of the same standard as the big guns.

Turak wrote:
> the gc graphics are basic, must be looking at pikmin and zelda

Its not the Gamecubes graphics its the game, the gamecube can support as much as any other console (I.e. Xbox, as PS2 is old) and if the people who made the game are good at graphics then it will look good, just look at resident evil, AMAZING graphics, Zelda is made to look manga style, as it was origanally a manga.

Turak wrote:
> the gc graphics are basic, must be looking at pikmin and zelda

hmm, is this some pathetic attempt at sarcasm?

cos if so it didnt work!
and if it isnt, then what are you on about?
make sense please!

the gc graphics are basic, must be looking at pikmin and zelda

GcMaster wrote:
> Im Not A Goat puss Whatever
>
>
> I wont play games that dont have good graphics, its a sign of lasyness


um, a sign of lazyness?

what the....?

i think it is more a sign of good design!
it makes me think that there has been more time put into the gameplay than wasted on making a shíte game look pretty!!

graphics is about as important as my opinions on world politics!

Dont post here anymore, let this Topic just go dont the listings into oblivian, i hate myself for taking the **** out of the box of tricks

Because those some games that you are talking are most probably ports from the playstation 2 and the Xbox which I don't really mind having ports because its better to have more then less,as long as it is not the only thing gamecube gets,just PS2 and Xbox cast offs,allthough there has been great multi platform games on GC,take timesplitters 2,a game that some beleave is a true golden eye beater.So dont judge the gamecube by some of the not so great ports that wornt even great where they came from,just be gratful for how many games (may I just say that there are a lot more great then bad) are coming onto are little purple(or black) box'o'tricks..OK!

GcMaster wrote:
> I look for graphics and gamply, come on name a game that has good
> grpaihcs and crap gameplay?

Agent Under Fire is a prime example; it looked great, but played appallingly bad. I couldn't list anymore game because I don't usually buy crap game, you see I'm not easily suckered into buying a game just because it looks good. Unless it plays well, I'm not buying it.

GcMaster wrote:
> Look fool did i mention that zelda didnt look amazing?
>
> its looks amazing the grpaics look spot on
>
>
>
> Fool


I think you'll find I was talking about the SNES game, Zelda: A Link to the past

That game didnt have good graphics, yet it is one of the best games of all time. But you wouldn't play it on general principle?
Don't call me a fool, especially when you have no comprehension of the simple ideas I am trying to convey

Im not Human

Im Captian Zogg form the Starfox System

cipro wrote:
> Anyone who puts graphics over game-play isn't a gamer.

Or even human.