The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
MSG2 is going to be a great game am I right? but for some reason it should come out this month yeah? But it been delayed for march So am I sorry for the people who have wait for it but please keep sane until march or further notice.
Page:
Ant wrote:
> slave2games wrote:
> Whats so good about MGS2? Oh wow, it has beter
> graphics, and look! Shadows! face
> it, it's just the first one with a lick
> of paint. Resident Evil may or may not
> sell well, but if not, it's only
> because of the Sony zealots who'll buy
> whatevers shoved under their noses
> *cough*MGS2*cough*
You're talking complete bol*ocks. Just the graphics?? Are
> so ignorant that you can't notice the amazing amout of new gameplay in
> MGS2??!!
You can hang onto ledges and jump onto people, you can peek round
> corners and shoot AND the AI is superb! You point a gun at a guard from behind
> and he'll gasp and put his hands up. Point at his crotch he'll give you a
> ration, point at his head and he'll give you ammo/ration. Shoot fire
> extinguishers and they'll blow up, hopefully killing the guard near to it. You
> can hide them in cupbaords so they won't be found-there's so much to do! Have
> you actually played it?? More than any other game has ever offered. There's a
> new plot with new characters, new weapons and of course, better
> graphics.
You're either completely insane, or jealous that the GC is getting
> the crap RE series instead of MGS2.
I watched my mate play a demo, I was totally bored because I don't like this type of game. But you forgot to mention the storyline, from what I have heard it is trully superb.
> slave2games wrote:
> Whats so good about MGS2? Oh wow, it has beter
> graphics, and look! Shadows! face
> it, it's just the first one with a lick
> of paint. Resident Evil may or may not
> sell well, but if not, it's only
> because of the Sony zealots who'll buy
> whatevers shoved under their noses
> *cough*MGS2*cough*
You're talking complete bol*ocks. Just the graphics?? Are
> so ignorant that you can't notice the amazing amout of new gameplay in
> MGS2??!!
You can hang onto ledges and jump onto people, you can peek round
> corners and shoot AND the AI is superb! You point a gun at a guard from behind
> and he'll gasp and put his hands up. Point at his crotch he'll give you a
> ration, point at his head and he'll give you ammo/ration. Shoot fire
> extinguishers and they'll blow up, hopefully killing the guard near to it. You
> can hide them in cupbaords so they won't be found-there's so much to do! Have
> you actually played it?? More than any other game has ever offered. There's a
> new plot with new characters, new weapons and of course, better
> graphics.
You're either completely insane, or jealous that the GC is getting
> the crap RE series instead of MGS2.
I watched my mate play a demo, I was totally bored because I don't like this type of game. But you forgot to mention the storyline, from what I have heard it is trully superb.
Ha ha Solid Snake.
Tiltawhirl wrote:
> Blah blah blah blah blah blah, Mario rules MGS2 doesn't. End of story I win the
> argument.
*hands over ears*
LA LA LA LA not listening to you LA LA LA LA!!!
> Blah blah blah blah blah blah, Mario rules MGS2 doesn't. End of story I win the
> argument.
*hands over ears*
LA LA LA LA not listening to you LA LA LA LA!!!
Blah blah blah blah blah blah, Mario rules MGS2 doesn't. End of story I win the argument.
Donkey kong (i wouldn't count the Donkey Kong games)
Mario brothers 1 Mario Brothers 2 ( a very different game) mario brothers 3 (like the first).
Mario World (a revolution in itself), Mario world 2: yoshi's island (not actually staring mario and a different type of platformer).
Mario land 1 and 2 (gameboy versions of the above lot different titles but these games were just small versions of the bigger guys.)
Mario 64 (a 2D platformer to a 3D world is this a sequel?)
I counted 8 (excluding Donkey Kong).
Mario brothers 1 Mario Brothers 2 ( a very different game) mario brothers 3 (like the first).
Mario World (a revolution in itself), Mario world 2: yoshi's island (not actually staring mario and a different type of platformer).
Mario land 1 and 2 (gameboy versions of the above lot different titles but these games were just small versions of the bigger guys.)
Mario 64 (a 2D platformer to a 3D world is this a sequel?)
I counted 8 (excluding Donkey Kong).
Or†ega wrote:
> Yes but these Mario games take on different genres. Tennis, Fighting, board
> games, platformers :)
Its not just the same game released over and over
> again...
Sure, we had some ports onto the GBA, but thats becasue there is a
> good demand for them.
But still lots. {:) Mario Bros 1 and 2 (maybe more), Super Mario Bros 1 and 2 (maybe more), Mario 64-notice that the main reason people don't class them as sequels is the change of name. Adding 'Super' to the front for instance.
> Yes but these Mario games take on different genres. Tennis, Fighting, board
> games, platformers :)
Its not just the same game released over and over
> again...
Sure, we had some ports onto the GBA, but thats becasue there is a
> good demand for them.
But still lots. {:) Mario Bros 1 and 2 (maybe more), Super Mario Bros 1 and 2 (maybe more), Mario 64-notice that the main reason people don't class them as sequels is the change of name. Adding 'Super' to the front for instance.
Yes but these Mario games take on different genres. Tennis, Fighting, board games, platformers :)
Its not just the same game released over and over again...
Sure, we had some ports onto the GBA, but thats becasue there is a good demand for them.
Its not just the same game released over and over again...
Sure, we had some ports onto the GBA, but thats becasue there is a good demand for them.
Dringo wrote:
Final Fantasy x is a good
> game but we NEED NEW GAMES! GTA3 supplies this but FFX and MGS2 is just same
> old.
We don't! I've got lots of new games on the PS2: Smuggler's Run, Red Faction, Zone Of The Enders, Star Wars Starfighter, Max Payne, GTA3 and anyway, MGS2 is not the 'same old', at least gameplay and graphics-wise. More controls, weapons, new plot, characters etc.
I would say there's a nice balance between sequels and originals, and a sequel will work as long as there's some new elements involved. After all, sequels usually come after great originals.
Final Fantasy x is a good
> game but we NEED NEW GAMES! GTA3 supplies this but FFX and MGS2 is just same
> old.
We don't! I've got lots of new games on the PS2: Smuggler's Run, Red Faction, Zone Of The Enders, Star Wars Starfighter, Max Payne, GTA3 and anyway, MGS2 is not the 'same old', at least gameplay and graphics-wise. More controls, weapons, new plot, characters etc.
I would say there's a nice balance between sequels and originals, and a sequel will work as long as there's some new elements involved. After all, sequels usually come after great originals.
Page: