The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Theres no point of having the storyline as jericho always winning.
Page:
Theres no point of having the storyline as jericho always winning.
You're so right! Those script writers are kicking themselves...Jericho losing his titles to Maven would have been muuuuuuuch better!
What?? Surely you didn't expect Maven or Tazz to beat Y2J??
I think it was a great week for Y2J, as he actually won a clean match! And against Maven, he was tossed into the open turnbuckle, so he won a match in which Maven had an unfair advanntage!
I'm hoping Jericho can beat Austin at No Way Out, and go on to face Triple H at WrestleMania.
I think it was a great week for Y2J, as he actually won a clean match! And against Maven, he was tossed into the open turnbuckle, so he won a match in which Maven had an unfair advanntage!
I'm hoping Jericho can beat Austin at No Way Out, and go on to face Triple H at WrestleMania.
Ant wrote:
1. What?? Surely you didn't expect Maven or Tazz to beat Y2J??
2. I think it was a great week for Y2J, as he actually won a clean match! And against Maven, he was tossed into the open turnbuckle, so he won a match in which Maven had an unfair advantage!
3. I'm hoping Jericho can beat Austin at No Way Out, and go on to face Triple H at WrestleMania.
--------------
Right, I just numbered those, here are my answers.
1. Yes I did actually seeing as they were both non-title matches and Jericho normally looses them, well the Tazz one was a non-title anyway.
2. The match he won with Tazz wasn't won fairly, he pulled Jackie (the ref's) hair so that she wouldn't see him doing a low blow on Tazz when the Tazzmission was locked in on him. And it wasn't as if they would let Maven win the WWF Title for his second win ever.
3. I'm not hoping that.... but that doesn't matter, the WWF will make it Austin vs Triple H at Wrestlemania. Simple!
1. What?? Surely you didn't expect Maven or Tazz to beat Y2J??
2. I think it was a great week for Y2J, as he actually won a clean match! And against Maven, he was tossed into the open turnbuckle, so he won a match in which Maven had an unfair advantage!
3. I'm hoping Jericho can beat Austin at No Way Out, and go on to face Triple H at WrestleMania.
--------------
Right, I just numbered those, here are my answers.
1. Yes I did actually seeing as they were both non-title matches and Jericho normally looses them, well the Tazz one was a non-title anyway.
2. The match he won with Tazz wasn't won fairly, he pulled Jackie (the ref's) hair so that she wouldn't see him doing a low blow on Tazz when the Tazzmission was locked in on him. And it wasn't as if they would let Maven win the WWF Title for his second win ever.
3. I'm not hoping that.... but that doesn't matter, the WWF will make it Austin vs Triple H at Wrestlemania. Simple!
AfroJoe wrote:
Right, I just numbered those, here are my
> answers.
1. Yes I did actually seeing as they were both non-title matches and
> Jericho normally looses them, well the Tazz one was a non-title anyway.
2.
> The match he won with Tazz wasn't won fairly, he pulled Jackie (the ref's) hair
> so that she wouldn't see him doing a low blow on Tazz when the Tazzmission was
> locked in on him. And it wasn't as if they would let Maven win the WWF Title for
> his second win ever.
3. I'm not hoping that.... but that doesn't matter, the
> WWF will make it Austin vs Triple H at Wrestlemania. Simple!
2. A low blow?? Bah, that's nothing. Everyone does it, no one ever gets DQ'd for it.
3. They won't because they had this mini-match at the Rumble. Me thinks it'll be HHH vs Jericho, or Austin vs Rock vs HHH. Either would suit me, the latter hopefully being the final match in the massive feud between those three, hopefully letting someone else rise up to WM main event status.
Right, I just numbered those, here are my
> answers.
1. Yes I did actually seeing as they were both non-title matches and
> Jericho normally looses them, well the Tazz one was a non-title anyway.
2.
> The match he won with Tazz wasn't won fairly, he pulled Jackie (the ref's) hair
> so that she wouldn't see him doing a low blow on Tazz when the Tazzmission was
> locked in on him. And it wasn't as if they would let Maven win the WWF Title for
> his second win ever.
3. I'm not hoping that.... but that doesn't matter, the
> WWF will make it Austin vs Triple H at Wrestlemania. Simple!
2. A low blow?? Bah, that's nothing. Everyone does it, no one ever gets DQ'd for it.
3. They won't because they had this mini-match at the Rumble. Me thinks it'll be HHH vs Jericho, or Austin vs Rock vs HHH. Either would suit me, the latter hopefully being the final match in the massive feud between those three, hopefully letting someone else rise up to WM main event status.
2. A low blow?? Bah, that's nothing. Everyone does
> it, no one ever gets DQ'd for it.
William Regal did, in his match with RVD, on Smack!Down...which i'm assuming you've seen and i'm not spoiling anything, cos you knew about the Jericho/Tazz match...
> it, no one ever gets DQ'd for it.
William Regal did, in his match with RVD, on Smack!Down...which i'm assuming you've seen and i'm not spoiling anything, cos you knew about the Jericho/Tazz match...
†hë_Çøñg_Mðñ wrote:
> 2. A low blow?? Bah, that's nothing. Everyone does
> it, no one ever gets
> DQ'd for it.
William Regal did, in his match with RVD, on
> Smack!Down...which i'm assuming you've seen and i'm not spoiling anything, cos
> you knew about the Jericho/Tazz match...
Yeah, but that was a pretty weak match.
And that was on RAW.
> 2. A low blow?? Bah, that's nothing. Everyone does
> it, no one ever gets
> DQ'd for it.
William Regal did, in his match with RVD, on
> Smack!Down...which i'm assuming you've seen and i'm not spoiling anything, cos
> you knew about the Jericho/Tazz match...
Yeah, but that was a pretty weak match.
And that was on RAW.
Ant wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
Right, I just numbered those, here are my
> answers.
1.
> Yes I did actually seeing as they were both non-title matches and
> Jericho
> normally looses them, well the Tazz one was a non-title anyway.
2.
> The
> match he won with Tazz wasn't won fairly, he pulled Jackie (the ref's)
> hair
> so that she wouldn't see him doing a low blow on Tazz when the
> Tazzmission was
> locked in on him. And it wasn't as if they would let Maven
> win the WWF Title for
> his second win ever.
3. I'm not hoping that....
> but that doesn't matter, the
> WWF will make it Austin vs Triple H at
> Wrestlemania. Simple!
2. A low blow?? Bah, that's nothing. Everyone does
> it, no one ever gets DQ'd for it.
3. They won't because they had this
> mini-match at the Rumble. Me thinks it'll be HHH vs Jericho, or Austin vs Rock
> vs HHH. Either would suit me, the latter hopefully being the final match in the
> massive feud between those three, hopefully letting someone else rise up to WM
> main event status.
No-one gets DQ'd for a low blow because the ref's never see it, they are always looking the other way, strangely enough.
> AfroJoe wrote:
Right, I just numbered those, here are my
> answers.
1.
> Yes I did actually seeing as they were both non-title matches and
> Jericho
> normally looses them, well the Tazz one was a non-title anyway.
2.
> The
> match he won with Tazz wasn't won fairly, he pulled Jackie (the ref's)
> hair
> so that she wouldn't see him doing a low blow on Tazz when the
> Tazzmission was
> locked in on him. And it wasn't as if they would let Maven
> win the WWF Title for
> his second win ever.
3. I'm not hoping that....
> but that doesn't matter, the
> WWF will make it Austin vs Triple H at
> Wrestlemania. Simple!
2. A low blow?? Bah, that's nothing. Everyone does
> it, no one ever gets DQ'd for it.
3. They won't because they had this
> mini-match at the Rumble. Me thinks it'll be HHH vs Jericho, or Austin vs Rock
> vs HHH. Either would suit me, the latter hopefully being the final match in the
> massive feud between those three, hopefully letting someone else rise up to WM
> main event status.
No-one gets DQ'd for a low blow because the ref's never see it, they are always looking the other way, strangely enough.
Ant wrote:
> †hë_Çøñg_Mðñ wrote:
> 2. A low blow??
> Bah, that's nothing. Everyone does
> it, no one ever gets
> DQ'd for it.
>
William Regal did, in his match with RVD, on
> Smack!Down...which i'm
> assuming you've seen and i'm not spoiling anything, cos
> you knew about the
> Jericho/Tazz match...
Yeah, but that was a pretty weak match.
And that was
> on RAW.
Good point...been a long week...
> †hë_Çøñg_Mðñ wrote:
> 2. A low blow??
> Bah, that's nothing. Everyone does
> it, no one ever gets
> DQ'd for it.
>
William Regal did, in his match with RVD, on
> Smack!Down...which i'm
> assuming you've seen and i'm not spoiling anything, cos
> you knew about the
> Jericho/Tazz match...
Yeah, but that was a pretty weak match.
And that was
> on RAW.
Good point...been a long week...
You get DQ by Low Blow if the Referee see's it, if he dosen't then you don't get DQ obviously and carry on the match.
Page: