Viewing Thread:
"Why are they letting jericho always win?It just gets on my nerves."

Theres no point of having the storyline as jericho always winning.

However it was good when he kept listening to his watch, that was great.

"You know what this watch is saying!?"

Ant wrote:
> Anyone realise that Austin was WWF Champion from:

WrestleMania - Vengeance
> (with a 2-week gap in the middle.)

That's nearly 8 months. 8 MONTHS!! Now
> that is one long title run, so he obviously kept winning, and no one really
> complained.

Yep exactly what i'm talking about, he didn't even always put the belt on the line either.

*Groan mumble

Notice how that period was the WWF's worst in such along time?

Anyone realise that Austin was WWF Champion from:

WrestleMania - Vengeance (with a 2-week gap in the middle.)

That's nearly 8 months. 8 MONTHS!! Now that is one long title run, so he obviously kept winning, and no one really complained.

I don't mind it much, the champion should win lots it's like a right that comes with the belt or something.

We should all moan about Stone Cold winning all the funning time it's getting a bit boring, he only looses tag teams mathces where he dosn't get pinned or gets a screw job.

We should also moan about how some 'top' superstarts disagree to do certain things on shows and use their backstage power to inlfluence storylines to their liking.

Scott Giles wrote:
> You get DQ by Low Blow if the Referee see's it, if he dosen't then you don't get
> DQ obviously and carry on the match.

Just what I said a small while ago.

You get DQ by Low Blow if the Referee see's it, if he dosen't then you don't get DQ obviously and carry on the match.

Ant wrote:
> †hë_Çøñg_Mðñ wrote:
> 2. A low blow??
> Bah, that's nothing. Everyone does
> it, no one ever gets
> DQ'd for it.
>


William Regal did, in his match with RVD, on
> Smack!Down...which i'm
> assuming you've seen and i'm not spoiling anything, cos
> you knew about the
> Jericho/Tazz match...

Yeah, but that was a pretty weak match.

And that was
> on RAW.

Good point...been a long week...

Ant wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
Right, I just numbered those, here are my
> answers.

1.
> Yes I did actually seeing as they were both non-title matches and
> Jericho
> normally looses them, well the Tazz one was a non-title anyway.

2.
> The
> match he won with Tazz wasn't won fairly, he pulled Jackie (the ref's)
> hair
> so that she wouldn't see him doing a low blow on Tazz when the
> Tazzmission was
> locked in on him. And it wasn't as if they would let Maven
> win the WWF Title for
> his second win ever.

3. I'm not hoping that....
> but that doesn't matter, the
> WWF will make it Austin vs Triple H at
> Wrestlemania. Simple!


2. A low blow?? Bah, that's nothing. Everyone does
> it, no one ever gets DQ'd for it.

3. They won't because they had this
> mini-match at the Rumble. Me thinks it'll be HHH vs Jericho, or Austin vs Rock
> vs HHH. Either would suit me, the latter hopefully being the final match in the
> massive feud between those three, hopefully letting someone else rise up to WM
> main event status.

No-one gets DQ'd for a low blow because the ref's never see it, they are always looking the other way, strangely enough.

†hë_Çøñg_Mðñ wrote:
> 2. A low blow?? Bah, that's nothing. Everyone does
> it, no one ever gets
> DQ'd for it.


William Regal did, in his match with RVD, on
> Smack!Down...which i'm assuming you've seen and i'm not spoiling anything, cos
> you knew about the Jericho/Tazz match...

Yeah, but that was a pretty weak match.

And that was on RAW.

2. A low blow?? Bah, that's nothing. Everyone does
> it, no one ever gets DQ'd for it.


William Regal did, in his match with RVD, on Smack!Down...which i'm assuming you've seen and i'm not spoiling anything, cos you knew about the Jericho/Tazz match...