The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Infact the PS2 version has extras, that are geared more towards the PS2 user as they demand more and have higher skill level, not my words but the actual developers comments.
Then again I can imagine that it's a hard game for Xbox users because of their poorly designed controllers.
There are so many.
Have you seen the
"You have completed the Eternal darkness Demo to buy the fulll game "etc?
> Cyclone wrote:
> Insane Bartender wrote:
> Update2.01 wrote:
> What is wrong with GTA3 or VC?
>
> Nothing that wasn't wrong with every other iteration of the game, ie
> it's a load of rubbish. I suppose the original had the bonus of
> being
> fairly original, but every single version has been found by me to be
> utterly lacking in decent gameplay.
>
> And before you go saying "oh it rocks" or whatever, if you
> give a kid a stick and a few things to smash, it will be entertained
> for countless hours, that doesn't necessarilly make it worthwhile
> entertainment.
>
> Compare any GTA game with a FF game or a Zelda or a Mario or
> anything
> of real quality, and it just looks and plays like a load of useless
> pap.
>
> Just my opinion, I'm aware that many are opposed to it, but hey,
> obviously I've learned nothing in 17 years of playing video games,
> eh?
>
> Likewise. Except make that about 11 years of gaming. :D
>
> I can improve my word count too!
Me too!
:D
I'll stop now.
> SPOILER
>
>
> I like the sanity effect where "Windows has performed an illegal
> error press CTRL ALT DELETE" etc.
>
> The one where you walk on the ceiling is overused.
The best one has to be the Hamlet skull.
That was my first too.
:)
> Insane Bartender wrote:
> Update2.01 wrote:
> What is wrong with GTA3 or VC?
>
> Nothing that wasn't wrong with every other iteration of the game, ie
> it's a load of rubbish. I suppose the original had the bonus of
> being
> fairly original, but every single version has been found by me to be
> utterly lacking in decent gameplay.
>
> And before you go saying "oh it rocks" or whatever, if you
> give a kid a stick and a few things to smash, it will be entertained
> for countless hours, that doesn't necessarilly make it worthwhile
> entertainment.
>
> Compare any GTA game with a FF game or a Zelda or a Mario or
> anything
> of real quality, and it just looks and plays like a load of useless
> pap.
>
> Just my opinion, I'm aware that many are opposed to it, but hey,
> obviously I've learned nothing in 17 years of playing video games,
> eh?
>
> Likewise. Except make that about 11 years of gaming. :D
I can improve my word count too!
> Update2.01 wrote:
> What is wrong with GTA3 or VC?
>
> Nothing that wasn't wrong with every other iteration of the game, ie
> it's a load of rubbish. I suppose the original had the bonus of being
> fairly original, but every single version has been found by me to be
> utterly lacking in decent gameplay.
>
> And before you go saying "oh it rocks" or whatever, if you
> give a kid a stick and a few things to smash, it will be entertained
> for countless hours, that doesn't necessarilly make it worthwhile
> entertainment.
>
> Compare any GTA game with a FF game or a Zelda or a Mario or anything
> of real quality, and it just looks and plays like a load of useless
> pap.
>
> Just my opinion, I'm aware that many are opposed to it, but hey,
> obviously I've learned nothing in 17 years of playing video games, eh?
Likewise. Except make that about 11 years of gaming. :D
I like the sanity effect where "Windows has performed an illegal error press CTRL ALT DELETE" etc.
The one where you walk on the ceiling is overused.
> What is wrong with GTA3 or VC?
Nothing that wasn't wrong with every other iteration of the game, ie it's a load of rubbish. I suppose the original had the bonus of being fairly original, but every single version has been found by me to be utterly lacking in decent gameplay.
And before you go saying "oh it rocks" or whatever, if you give a kid a stick and a few things to smash, it will be entertained for countless hours, that doesn't necessarilly make it worthwhile entertainment.
Compare any GTA game with a FF game or a Zelda or a Mario or anything of real quality, and it just looks and plays like a load of useless pap.
Just my opinion, I'm aware that many are opposed to it, but hey, obviously I've learned nothing in 17 years of playing video games, eh?
> More GTA bashing i see...
Where? It was merely mentioned that it was unoriginal. Which it is.
Lots of it in recent times - since GTA3.
Can't remember anything like this with the old "top down" versions.
What is wrong with GTA3 or VC? Is it just a few things like frame rate (much better on VC), graphic style, or control system, or is it the "entire idea" of the thing. What would you have instead?