Viewing Thread:
"Wanadoo games. Character movement"

Has any one else out there had problems with Wanadoo produced games for the P.C? I've tried Robin Hood and Inquisition and after the intro sequence, they don't work. For example in Inquisitor when it cuts to the scene in the cell, the character justs keeps running into the wall and the direction arrows don't work.

Cowdarse wrote:
> So by your own parameters, there is no point in replying to
> pointlessness.
> Having determined that, I have also determined that any further
> exchange is unneccesary and cede the stage to you in order that you
> have more time to be pedantic elsewere!

I was unaware I was being Pedantic about all this, and perhaps I should make my intention in this thread more clear. I was mearly trying to say that there was no need to post four threads saying exactly the same thing when you could have just used one, but now it seems to have turned into argument with each of us trying to out-ponce one another.

My apologies if I avoided the point of this thread, but you'll find I'm much more forgiving than the rest of the users on this forum who would have by now swarmed this thread with abusive and Inflammatory comments Welcome to the forums by the way.

Also, I only ever played a demo of Robin hood and I didn't find that engaging. If you haven't already got it, I'd suggest Commandos 2 which is allot more involving and rewarding than robin hood, and not as boring either. My opinion of course.

Cowdarse wrote:
> John.J wrote:
> just a question. Is the Robin hood game any good?
>
> YES!!................ uh NO!!
>
> The truth,............. never found out.

Sorry, didn't finish the explanation! After the opening sequence, when I tried to move the main character, I got a "This game has performed an illegal ? and will be terminated" message. I tried uninstall and reinstall several times and got the same message. Maybe it's my system, but, it's well in advance of the game's requirements. Sorry for being long-winded, but I can't help further than that.

ManicMyna wrote:
> ever considered that they ain't supposed to work and are just ads for
> a rather naff isp which likes to support users of sub seven trojan by
> not closing their accounts?

I hadn't until now, ............ thanks to your reply,now I have. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction.

John.J wrote:
> just a question. Is the Robin hood game any good?

YES!!................ uh NO!!

The truth,............. never found out.

cipro wrote:
> Cowdarse wrote:
> cipro wrote:
> Sorry can't help you, and was there any real need to post this four
> times? I think not.
>
> Since you can't help, was there any "real need" to post a
> reply?
>
> Of course not, but there was a need to pint out the pointlessness of
> those four threads you posted which said the same thing.

So by your own parameters, there is no point in replying to pointlessness.
Having determined that, I have also determined that any further exchange is unneccesary and cede the stage to you in order that you have more time to be pedantic elsewere!

Cowdarse wrote:
> cipro wrote:
> Sorry can't help you, and was there any real need to post this four
> times? I think not.
>
> Since you can't help, was there any "real need" to post a
> reply?

Of course not, but there was a need to pint out the pointlessness of those four threads you posted which said the same thing.

just a question. Is the Robin hood game any good?

cipro wrote:
> Sorry can't help you, and was there any real need to post this four
> times? I think not.


Since you can't help, was there any "real need" to post a reply?

ever considered that they ain't supposed to work and are just ads for a rather naff isp which likes to support users of sub seven trojan by not closing their accounts?

Sorry can't help you, and was there any real need to post this four times? I think not.