The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
My friends and I always say stuff like 'Imagine if you could....' or 'It would be so cool if....'. So I want to know what other people want to see in games.
Page:
Black Glove wrote:
> I'd like to see:
>
> Smaller, more enclosed gameworlds, with a massive amount of detail and
> 'interactability'.
> The kind of thing where you could pick up a random box of matches and
> strike one.
same here i wish that anything that would be placed in a level like props could be used likea car on the side of the road.
> I'd like to see:
>
> Smaller, more enclosed gameworlds, with a massive amount of detail and
> 'interactability'.
> The kind of thing where you could pick up a random box of matches and
> strike one.
same here i wish that anything that would be placed in a level like props could be used likea car on the side of the road.
I cant Wait Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas Is comming out And I hope You can Download Game saves On the Playstation 2 SOON! and does anyone know how to get a copy right Allowance for Grand Theft Auton : Vice City
I'd like to see:
Smaller, more enclosed gameworlds, with a massive amount of detail and 'interactability'.
The kind of thing where you could pick up a random box of matches and strike one.
Smaller, more enclosed gameworlds, with a massive amount of detail and 'interactability'.
The kind of thing where you could pick up a random box of matches and strike one.
I just thought of something. Since everyone complained about Raiden, though I think he's alright (Not as good as Snake but Im probably going to get alot of abuse now!), It would be cool if Konami made MGS 2:SOL where it's only the Plant you play. BUT It's Snake's side of the story.
Small Blue. Trying to push your word count up are we?
Futuristic things
Though... wouldn't this be more relevent in the 'Future of Games' Forum, rather than the 'Retro-Games' forum?
Small Blue wrote:
> Why the hell have you replied to yourself when you could've written it
> all in one post?
Maybe he just remembered something he wanted to say and replyed to put it in. I do that all the time.
> Why the hell have you replied to yourself when you could've written it
> all in one post?
Maybe he just remembered something he wanted to say and replyed to put it in. I do that all the time.
Why the hell have you replied to yourself when you could've written it all in one post?
And to ensure that it sinks in, I'll say it a few more timee:
Why the hell have you replied to yourself when you could've written it all in one post?
Why the hell have you replied to yourself when you could've written it all in one post?
Why the hell have you replied to yourself when you could've written it all in one post?
Why the hell have you replied to yourself when you could've written it all in one post?
Why the hell have you replied to yourself when you could've written it all in one post?
And to ensure that it sinks in, I'll say it a few more timee:
Why the hell have you replied to yourself when you could've written it all in one post?
Why the hell have you replied to yourself when you could've written it all in one post?
Why the hell have you replied to yourself when you could've written it all in one post?
Why the hell have you replied to yourself when you could've written it all in one post?
Why the hell have you replied to yourself when you could've written it all in one post?
Personaly I would like to see a RPG with multiplayer mode + multiplayer mission mode (normal game but 2 player), upgradeable items/weapons, secret items/levels/areas & maybe some online capabilities.
Page: