Viewing Thread:
"This is going to upset a lot of people"

I can't stand Feeder. They make the most boring, bog-standard pieces of dog crap that I have ever heard. They weren't always this bad though. I have 'Insomnia', but everything since then sounds the same. I can't tell the difference between them, Stereophonics and Travis. They all make bog-standard pap that's been done a million times before and should be locked in a dungeon and tortured.

I've been home from Uni a couple of days and I've had a chance to listen to the only Feeder single I own, "Insomnia".

Once again I re-itterate on what I said - Feeder suck and lick balls, pure and simple. I think I'll smash the CD wiv head and blu-tak it to the wall next to smashed Mmm-Bop.

I recommend this CD as a cure for Insomnia, hur hur.

Sibs wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> I can't agree with you there, ever since I heard them on GT3
> they've been one of
> my favourites.

And no band is crap. They all have
> talent, even if it's just
> singing (Feeder play their own instruments too
> though, I believe.)

Unless
> you're talking about garage music
> though...

LOL! I have a mate who swears by Garage music!!! Says it is 'The
> Future'. If that's true I will stay in the past...
>
Oh, but many 'bands' don't
> have talent. It is mainly those who don't play their own instruments, as these
> are often (not always) 'bands' that can't play an instrument, don't write songs,
> and don't even ACTUALLY sing. Live, they mime it, and on CD they screw around
> with their voices to get them to sound 'good' (I use the term VERY
> loosely...)

>Anyway, that's my opinion so have fun disagreeing with it...

I will. :D

They don't have much talent, but I'll admit. Most members of Hear'Say can sing better than me.

Lets put it this way, there are much more talented people out there.

Monkey, what do you think of Sum41?

2 out of 3 ain't bad.

i agree with ur comments about Feeder. All their music does sound the same, and i was foolishly charmed into getting a copy of Yesterday Went To Soon. this album was just... rubbish. All their songs were just too dismal, and all they did was put me in a bad mood, which is obviously why i stopped listening to them. however, dont compare them to the Phonics, because they are class. With the exception of 'Have A Nice Day' they have produced some quality songs and the first three on Just Enough Education To Perform were amazing. That is a quality album. Also Kelly Jones has a superb voice as it is so different to most singers out their today. He's much better than that Feeder bloke anyway. Travis to are terrible, as all their songs sound the same even more than Feeder. The guy has got like a monotone voice which just bores the hell out of me. For all those Feeder and Travis fans out their fair doos, if thats your type of music, go buy it but the Phonics are in a league much higher than either of these bands and shouldn't be compared to them. Ever. (until they produce something crap, which probably wont happen).

Dr Monkey rock more than Feeder. I miss Dr Monkey. Me want play in band again.

LOL

Just smash your head off the guitar, bass, drums, triangle... whatever.

Feeder do suck... one of those gits who manage to create small fanbase and get lucky break... BAH

Feeder suck. Boring, boring, boring stuff that anyone with a large amp could churn out. I could do better, with no arms.

I quite like Travis, though moreso when they were touring before and during their first album time, they were a goos laugh then, but most of the fun has disappeared from their songs.

I've gone right off the Stereophonics though. "Have a Nice Day" was the sound of a band with nothing left to say, and I've never liked Feeder.

Ant wrote:
> I can't agree with you there, ever since I heard them on GT3 they've been one of
> my favourites.

And no band is crap. They all have talent, even if it's just
> singing (Feeder play their own instruments too though, I believe.)

Unless
> you're talking about garage music though...

LOL! I have a mate who swears by Garage music!!! Says it is 'The Future'. If that's true I will stay in the past...

Oh, but many 'bands' don't have talent. It is mainly those who don't play their own instruments, as these are often (not always) 'bands' that can't play an instrument, don't write songs, and don't even ACTUALLY sing. Live, they mime it, and on CD they screw around with their voices to get them to sound 'good' (I use the term VERY loosely...)

Anyway, that's my opinion so have fun disagreeing with it...

I thought you were anti-pop...