Viewing Thread:
"Vice City !!!!"

I think Vice City is rubbish here is why...
1.Too Boring
2.Too Easy
3.Crap Graphics

+ many more .
Do you like it?


comments please

I see.

Interesting.

Nebuchan wrote:
> Yeah, right, my old P200 was bought in 1998, and that hardly runs GTA
> 2. And it's had tons of ram stuck in it.

Sorry man... runs like a dream... as does Castle Wolfenstein, Max Payne, Jedi Outcast, Morrowind, etc...

I cant run them a 1280x1024 as I would like... but 1024x768, whilst dated, works for me?

Gin Soaked Shanks wrote:
> I can run GTA3 on my old PC which I picked up back in 1998 (and at
> 1024x768res - considerably higher than the PS2 version too)

Yeah, right, my old P200 was bought in 1998, and that hardly runs GTA 2. And it's had tons of ram stuck in it.

Updated wrote:
> PC VC is no good to me - my PC can't run it. Still, I can still run
> the PS2 version right now. Unless you can keep spending out on pc
> upgrades (i can't), consoles are they way to go for games.

I can run GTA3 on my old PC which I picked up back in 1998 (and at 1024x768res - considerably higher than the PS2 version too)

Samus Aran wrote:
> Hello

Er...what?

Hello

Azul wrote:
> But VC for the PS2 is long since dead, we don't give a damn about
> that.
> It's the PC vers that we're looking forward to;
> improved graphics
> improved sound quality and sounds
> extra features
> and more that I can't remember.  :-D

PC VC is no good to me - my PC can't run it. Still, I can still run the PS2 version right now. Unless you can keep spending out on pc upgrades (i can't), consoles are they way to go for games.

heh i just wrote same kinda topic but i took a bit longer than 30 seconds on it :p

Lou Role wrote:
>GTA3 and VC are the only reasons I keep my PS2.

It's funny how things change. I just saw the demo for Chaos Legion, yes.

He may have been referring to that size font in a notebook, who knows.

(He does)