The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
So know games will be shorter and easier to play, gah! We still have Resident Evil and Sega to deliver the goods but Nintendo have freely admitted that their biggest titles, Mario, Zelda etc are now going to be much easier and more accesable to children and whats their excuse? They say children are Nintendos biggest audience so are looking to 'corner the market.'
This could lead to bigger better things as a whole in the future but for now it will ruin games like Zelda for me, at least a lot more games will be released a lot more often now. Don't go explaining how we have Pikmin or listing all adult games Gamecube had bu ti'm just saying that giving shorter versions of Zelda takes something away from it, no more 60 hours plus wasted on video gaming a small 30 - 40 now.
P.S I hope this causes controversy about Nintendo not being childish.
> whatt he hell is all this talk about "kiddie games" on the
> GC???????,
hasnt anyone here seen the movie for resident evil on it??.....a tad
> violent at the end i maight add.......not really for kids!.....see for
> yourselves
http://cube.ign.com/previews/17045.html
One game doesn't get rid of the image!
Even though I think this argument about "Kiddie" image is a load of ****! I'm not a kid and I love Nintendo games!
Frankly I don't see anything wrong with the games which have been anounced so far, and they have persuaded me that waiting for Gamecube is the right choice to make instead of getting a PS2, like some FOOLS have done!
:)
However, back to the point...
how many of you are not disapointed that the images of the "realistic" looking Zelda fight scene between Link and Gannondorf were not taken forwards and turned into a real game?
And if you are one of these people: you're lying!
Sonic
> Sibs wrote:
(no offense to any Japanese, but
> just cos the Japanese
> 'invented' gaming as it were, doesn't mean you should make
> games easier
> etc. to feel better about yourselves... as my teachers always
> say...
> 'You're only cheating yourself')
erm..... The spectrum n stuff were out
> well before the NES etc. It was pretty much the English who invented
> gaming!
:)
I know the older consoles and stuff weren't japanese, but that's why it was in inverted commas. I meant the Japanese see themselves as the 'inventors' of gaming, and to an extent, they are the 'inventors' of modern gaming, but not retro gaming (pre-NES retro that is...)
So there Cooky!
And that makes it twice as bad that we get consoles so far behind Japan, since we (the british) were making games up in our bedrooms in the 70's and 80's before any of those new fangled Japanese consoles were around!
(even though, personnally I wasn't because I was only born 16 years ago. EXACTLY 16 years ago actually! It's my Bday!)
They always pushed the boundaries of gaming from Mario's true 3D setting to Zelda 64's freedom.
Apparently, Zelda is going to be easier, shorter and linear for children and casual gamers.
Children who'll buy the game anyway and probably still won't complete it and casual gamers who won't buy the game anyway because it looks cartoony.
I think that the real reason is that Nintendo wants to make more games quickly and make more money out of more releases rather than spending more time on one or two.
I wouldn't mind if it was just a few odd extra games they were doing this with but to cut short the big epic Zelda we were so looking forward to is a big disappointment.
I'm hoping that it's just an antihype marketing ploy to lower our expectations.
Otherwise, I, along with hundreds of other hardcore Nintendo fans will see the "15 hours" in the review, and decide to rent it instead.
All the people who aren't Nintendo hardcore fans will dissmiss it as a cartoony kiddies game and the sales will be dire and it'll serve Nintendo right.
Let's just hope that it's worst case scenario...