The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
WOW
This game rocks.
Absoloutly amazing, addictive magical etc etc
If anyone has the nerve to say that the graphics are rubbish or that the game's boring, they're just bloody stupid to be honest.
I won't give away anything about the game play, but believe me, if you've been looking forward to this game since OOT then you won't be dissapointed.
Problem with games like this though is you realise how crappy the majority of other games are.
I LOVE YOU SHIGSY YOU CRAZY JAPANEASE MENTALIST.
This game rocks.
Absoloutly amazing, addictive magical etc etc
If anyone has the nerve to say that the graphics are rubbish or that the game's boring, they're just bloody stupid to be honest.
I won't give away anything about the game play, but believe me, if you've been looking forward to this game since OOT then you won't be dissapointed.
Problem with games like this though is you realise how crappy the majority of other games are.
I LOVE YOU SHIGSY YOU CRAZY JAPANEASE MENTALIST.
Page:
Could include... David Gibbon, Gamestation on C4, gamespot what else :D
er-no wrote:
> Yeah, but not teletext.
>
> Just like Edge. They are sell outs.
As I say, I completely accept Teletext as scum.
> Yeah, but not teletext.
>
> Just like Edge. They are sell outs.
As I say, I completely accept Teletext as scum.
Seriously retarded was gonna review it and diss them but i need a Gamespot Complete Account.
Nevermind, I love Conflict Desert Storm, if these people are too short sided to realise what a superb game it is then that's their look out.
Gamespot must be retarded though.
They gave it under 50% on all other formats.
Gamespot must be retarded though.
They gave it under 50% on all other formats.
Gamespot ... 5.1
IGN gave Conflict 7.7 but i dont agree with them all i care about is people's opinion and my own so i can decide if its good or not..
I can acknowledge other peoples opinions but not in the case of Teletext.
They freely admit to sometimes marking games down to cause controversy.
Oh and in the case of comments early about being stupid if you criticise the graphics in Zelda, this still stands. You would have to be retarded to not realise how bloody amazing it looks, whether you enjoy the game or not is another thing entirely.
They freely admit to sometimes marking games down to cause controversy.
Oh and in the case of comments early about being stupid if you criticise the graphics in Zelda, this still stands. You would have to be retarded to not realise how bloody amazing it looks, whether you enjoy the game or not is another thing entirely.
Blank wrote:
> I know a lot of places like teletext have reviews that are utter pap
> based on nothing in particular, but sometimes it would be nice if you
> all acknowledged that some people might have a different opinion.
Yeah, but not teletext.
Just like Edge. They are sell outs.
> I know a lot of places like teletext have reviews that are utter pap
> based on nothing in particular, but sometimes it would be nice if you
> all acknowledged that some people might have a different opinion.
Yeah, but not teletext.
Just like Edge. They are sell outs.
I know a lot of places like teletext have reviews that are utter pap based on nothing in particular, but sometimes it would be nice if you all acknowledged that some people might have a different opinion.
That teletext thing is sold out anyway.
Page: