The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
What's your ultimate 'worst moment' in a game? doesn't have to be the worst game you ever played, just the worst moment.
Mine would be getting 90% through Zelda 64 before realising that i'd done something wrong very early on in the game which had caused it to wipe my save.
Mine would be getting 90% through Zelda 64 before realising that i'd done something wrong very early on in the game which had caused it to wipe my save.
Page:
gerrid wrote:
> I still mourn over the loss of DC-UK
I still mourn at the loss of the DC :(
> I still mourn over the loss of DC-UK
I still mourn at the loss of the DC :(
In CM4
Getting woking to the top of the conference, and not conceding a goal in my first 8 games. Then it decides to crash as i'm about to save it.
Getting woking to the top of the conference, and not conceding a goal in my first 8 games. Then it decides to crash as i'm about to save it.
cookie monster wrote:
> *NOM.
>
> God damn typo god, leave me in peace!!!!!
Yes NOM is truely crappy...
> *NOM.
>
> God damn typo god, leave me in peace!!!!!
Yes NOM is truely crappy...
I still mourn over the loss of DC-UK
*NOM.
God damn typo god, leave me in peace!!!!!
God damn typo god, leave me in peace!!!!!
NGC smells.
Like a dead cat.
With a maggot nest in its chest.
Like a dead cat.
With a maggot nest in its chest.
cookie monster wrote:
> I switched to NGC after that incident.
It just cemented the inklings I already had.
I think they 'got away' with giving it 90% because the review contained almost no actual text, except in the box with the score.
> I switched to NGC after that incident.
It just cemented the inklings I already had.
I think they 'got away' with giving it 90% because the review contained almost no actual text, except in the box with the score.
Hail Games TM!
gerrid wrote:
> cookie monster wrote:
> How they awarded it 90% i'll never know.
>
> I never bought it again, and I never will.
> Just because they gave South Park 90%, and that was why I bought it.
I switched to NGC after that incident.
> cookie monster wrote:
> How they awarded it 90% i'll never know.
>
> I never bought it again, and I never will.
> Just because they gave South Park 90%, and that was why I bought it.
I switched to NGC after that incident.
Semajal wrote:
> i dunno southpark 64 is gaming genius compared to another n64 game my
> mum got for like £5.
Yeah but theres a difference between paying £5 for a piece of guff, and paying £50 for a piece of guff.
> i dunno southpark 64 is gaming genius compared to another n64 game my
> mum got for like £5.
Yeah but theres a difference between paying £5 for a piece of guff, and paying £50 for a piece of guff.
Page: