The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Well the lovely people at GAD have given me another prize, only this time im not sure what to choose, i have two games in mind
Kingdom Hearts (I love squaresoft)
Silent Hill 3 (Liked number 2)
I have a PS2 (i dont need people telling me to trade it in, your just not funny). If you've recently got a game and really enjoyed it what is it and why?
Kingdom Hearts (I love squaresoft)
Silent Hill 3 (Liked number 2)
I have a PS2 (i dont need people telling me to trade it in, your just not funny). If you've recently got a game and really enjoyed it what is it and why?
Page:
well i think u should get silent hill 3! kingdom hearts is rubbish trust me i bought it it was crud or gat soul calibur 2 or 3 well the new one of it! it's awesome!
Nah. You need to follow FM's lead and claim Harry Potter.
It's very good, but unless you've played other Square RPG's it's probably a little too long. And the camera is fricking awful. Apart from that it's very nice.
Right I'm going to claim Silent Hill 3, but El Blokey can you tell me about Kingdom Hearts as i've had my eye on it for a while now and want to know whats its like.
SILENT HILL 3. Kingdom Hearts is a good game with many flaws. Silent Hill is an excellent game with hardly any.
Garlic Bread!? wrote:
> Alter Ego wrote:
> Silent Hill 3. Way better than the second (and that was amazing).
> Its the best game to hit the PS2 in a while. Your not going to get
> a
> better PS2 game at the moment.
>
> Really? I was worried it'd be a bit borin or too similar to the second
> one...
I thought that too but its got more action in it, no roaming around aimlessly outside, more surroundings than just the Hotel and the Hospital, ALOT more atmospheric, its tie-ins with the first game make it more intrigueing, and just the usual SH touch.
> Alter Ego wrote:
> Silent Hill 3. Way better than the second (and that was amazing).
> Its the best game to hit the PS2 in a while. Your not going to get
> a
> better PS2 game at the moment.
>
> Really? I was worried it'd be a bit borin or too similar to the second
> one...
I thought that too but its got more action in it, no roaming around aimlessly outside, more surroundings than just the Hotel and the Hospital, ALOT more atmospheric, its tie-ins with the first game make it more intrigueing, and just the usual SH touch.
Alter Ego wrote:
> Silent Hill 3. Way better than the second (and that was amazing).
> Its the best game to hit the PS2 in a while. Your not going to get a
> better PS2 game at the moment.
Really? I was worried it'd be a bit borin or too similar to the second one...
> Silent Hill 3. Way better than the second (and that was amazing).
> Its the best game to hit the PS2 in a while. Your not going to get a
> better PS2 game at the moment.
Really? I was worried it'd be a bit borin or too similar to the second one...
I was gonna say trade it in, but I thought otherwise.
Silent Hill 3. Way better than the second (and that was amazing). Its the best game to hit the PS2 in a while. Your not going to get a better PS2 game at the moment.
Trade it in.
I'm not trying to be funny.
I'm telling the truth.
I'm not trying to be funny.
I'm telling the truth.
Page: