The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Notorious Biggles wrote:
> It was goo.
Bit harsh don't you think?:)
Nope, no other opinions. Enjoyed it and the only problem I had was also with the lack of paragraphs.
> It was goo.
Bit harsh don't you think?:)
Nope, no other opinions. Enjoyed it and the only problem I had was also with the lack of paragraphs.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> I read your tuned version.
> Vary niece.
>
> Although no secks.
> You should always have secks.
Thanks. I will include secks next time. Maybe.
:p
> I read your tuned version.
> Vary niece.
>
> Although no secks.
> You should always have secks.
Thanks. I will include secks next time. Maybe.
:p
I read your tuned version.
Vary niece.
Although no secks.
You should always have secks.
Vary niece.
Although no secks.
You should always have secks.
Yeah, I've listened to some of your recommendations and fixed the paragraph parts. The fine tuned version is in the Stories forum, as I didn't really see any need to put it here.
Thanks for all your opinions :)
Thanks for all your opinions :)
Was quite good actually, with some good detail.
Also have to agree with the others about the paragraphs, but other than that it was good.
Also have to agree with the others about the paragraphs, but other than that it was good.
':)'
You were joking.
Doh!
You were joking.
Doh!
> Notorious Biggles wrote:
> It was goo.
I think he meant 'good'.
> It was goo.
I think he meant 'good'.
Notorious Biggles wrote:
> It was goo.
Bit harsh don't you think?:)
Nope, no other opinions. Enjoyed it and the only problem I had was also with the lack of paragraphs.
> It was goo.
Bit harsh don't you think?:)
Nope, no other opinions. Enjoyed it and the only problem I had was also with the lack of paragraphs.