The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Well, it seems NOM have listened to their customers and produced a new look mag again. It's a lot better than the old one, in my opinion, and it's actually pretty damn funny now. You'd do well to pick up a copy, if only to see which new direction the mag's taking.
Whatsmore, I'm in it! Page 32 - the first comment in the "Miyamoto Knows Best" box. That's me, right there! Ed Carter! Whoop! Rickoss is also in the mag - under the name of Richard Lambeth, on page 32 and 36. Good going mate! The review scores are pretty good too - they're back to percentages, and actually gave Product Number 03 a 56%! Controversial!
Give it a look, eh?
Whatsmore, I'm in it! Page 32 - the first comment in the "Miyamoto Knows Best" box. That's me, right there! Ed Carter! Whoop! Rickoss is also in the mag - under the name of Richard Lambeth, on page 32 and 36. Good going mate! The review scores are pretty good too - they're back to percentages, and actually gave Product Number 03 a 56%! Controversial!
Give it a look, eh?
Page:
Well, it seems NOM have listened to their customers and produced a new look mag again. It's a lot better than the old one, in my opinion, and it's actually pretty damn funny now. You'd do well to pick up a copy, if only to see which new direction the mag's taking.
Whatsmore, I'm in it! Page 32 - the first comment in the "Miyamoto Knows Best" box. That's me, right there! Ed Carter! Whoop! Rickoss is also in the mag - under the name of Richard Lambeth, on page 32 and 36. Good going mate! The review scores are pretty good too - they're back to percentages, and actually gave Product Number 03 a 56%! Controversial!
Give it a look, eh?
Whatsmore, I'm in it! Page 32 - the first comment in the "Miyamoto Knows Best" box. That's me, right there! Ed Carter! Whoop! Rickoss is also in the mag - under the name of Richard Lambeth, on page 32 and 36. Good going mate! The review scores are pretty good too - they're back to percentages, and actually gave Product Number 03 a 56%! Controversial!
Give it a look, eh?
But Bias should still previal, no?
I thought you said the last style was funny and informative?
NOM = rubbish
NOM = rubbish
No free demo discs ?
I actually really, really hate the design. They copied it from their old magazines design about 6 years ago, which sucked. So it's not really new, they should have stuck with what they had.
And what the hell's the point in giving away £50 vouchers for KFC?!?
And what the hell's the point in giving away £50 vouchers for KFC?!?
Rickoss wrote:
> And what the hell's the point in giving away £50 vouchers for
> KFC?!?
I'll put them to good use, explain in more detail please
> And what the hell's the point in giving away £50 vouchers for
> KFC?!?
I'll put them to good use, explain in more detail please
Well instead of giving away £50 of HMV vouchers to spend on games, they're giving away KFC. Oh, the joy, I can stuff myself full of chicken that tastes coincidentally like kagaroo meat.
They now understand that the majority of NOM readers are 6 year old fat kids who can't beat the first Gym Leader in Pokémon. So they give away prizes accordingly.
Plus, they put the wrong snippets of writing. Mine's on the left, yet my picture's in the middle.
Tribute wrote:
> But Bias should still previal, no?
They haven't been biased for ages now.
> But Bias should still previal, no?
They haven't been biased for ages now.
Page: