The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Freedom Fighters'.
This months official PS2 magazine has a review of Freedom Fighters and from what I have read of it I can't wait. They gave it a whopping....
........
......
....
..
.
9/10
Their overall verdict came to the fact that it was playable for almost anyone and its the best squad based game they have played to date. Audio/Visually it also scored 9/10 and with 18 missions + loads of ways to do each mission the lifespan scored an 8/10. The only problem was with the multiplayer and for fans of multiplayer games you may want to avoid this one.
Overall it sounds like a kick ass game with decent play across the board. I think I will pre order a copy right now :)
........
......
....
..
.
9/10
Their overall verdict came to the fact that it was playable for almost anyone and its the best squad based game they have played to date. Audio/Visually it also scored 9/10 and with 18 missions + loads of ways to do each mission the lifespan scored an 8/10. The only problem was with the multiplayer and for fans of multiplayer games you may want to avoid this one.
Overall it sounds like a kick ass game with decent play across the board. I think I will pre order a copy right now :)
Page:
Forget the score then. I'm just not taken by it at this stage- there are a lot of good games arriving soon and only the best will do.
They are a bad magaine whether they agree with me or not. It just clarifys it for me when they just when along and said what everyone else said. It wouldn't surprise me if that wasn't the case.
ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> when I would give
Yes, but I'm saying you have to acknowledge that giving TimeSplitters 2 9/10 is their opinion. You make them sound like bad magazines just because they disagree with you.
Even though OXM is crap anyway.
> ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> when I would give
Yes, but I'm saying you have to acknowledge that giving TimeSplitters 2 9/10 is their opinion. You make them sound like bad magazines just because they disagree with you.
Even though OXM is crap anyway.
ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> when I would give
> when I would give
10/10 for Timesplitters 2?
Are they insane? Thats a stupidly high score for just an average game.
Although OXM did give it 9.3
Are they insane? Thats a stupidly high score for just an average game.
Although OXM did give it 9.3
*agree with THEM on TimeSplitters 2
Yeah, but that's just your opinion against their's Ali. Personally, I'd agree on the issue of TimeSplitters 2, but probably give Enter the Matrix a 6/10.
OXM also gave Enter the Matrix 8/10 but the review and what they said about it made it sound very good. OXM are the same, they gave Enter the Matrix 8/10 and Timesplitters 2 9/10 when I would give both a maximum of 5/10 as they are nothing but average games. The proof will be in the pudding but ignoring the scores the game sounded very good from what they were saying.
OXM gave it 7.4 or so out of ten. It sounded ok but i'm not convinced. OPS2 mag gave Timesplitters 2 10/10 and I think most would say its nowhere nea that good.
From the footage i've sean Freedom fighters looks very repetive and samey. I'm got interested.
From the footage i've sean Freedom fighters looks very repetive and samey. I'm got interested.
It looks brilliant and from the same team behind Hitman 2 so I am expecting a similar style of play. With CDS 2: Return to Baghdad out in a couple of weeks I am going to see which one scores the fairer and then rent the one I aren't too sure about.
Page: