The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Command and Conquer Generals: Zero Hour'.
I am a big warcraft fan and I love the game because it is the perfect strat game but alot of people don't like it because it is not real enough.
Thier prefere C&C, which I think is a awfull game in all ways. You really have no major control over your armies in battles like warcraft and you can build super weapons to kill someone off without building a army.
I am wondering which you think is better between the two.
C&C
or
Warcraft
When you voted could you give reasons why
Thier prefere C&C, which I think is a awfull game in all ways. You really have no major control over your armies in battles like warcraft and you can build super weapons to kill someone off without building a army.
I am wondering which you think is better between the two.
C&C
or
Warcraft
When you voted could you give reasons why
Page:
Warcraft easily because it's fun and has great multiplayer. C&C has the edge in singleplayer, but overall the Multiplay isn't that good.
Rise of Nations!!!
Warcraft all the way.
Its the most skilled.
Its the most skilled.
Warcraft 3 = Much Support with many patches and player feedback. Its turely amazing. Get it. And play with me :)
C&C = No support. unbalanced. bad. and... yea :)
C&C = No support. unbalanced. bad. and... yea :)
Good god.
Just seen a video of that Rome: Total War - It looks fackin amazing.
And that Lord Of the Rings RTS....
Just seen a video of that Rome: Total War - It looks fackin amazing.
And that Lord Of the Rings RTS....
Sparkle, they those cut down budget cards? I think my last 3D card was a sparkle, finally replaced it with a Radeon 9600 Pro and never looked back. Can't believe I didn't upgrade it earlier.
Yeah, I think I'll upgrade my gfx card for that game.
Gives me an excuse to get rid of the god-awful sparkle piece of crap that SR fobbed me off with.
Gives me an excuse to get rid of the god-awful sparkle piece of crap that SR fobbed me off with.
Had a look on the site and no confirmed specs yet. I did hear in PCG that the developers where trying to get the game to run on the same specs for Medieval, but I just can't believe that.
Hmmm. But what would the min spec be on such a game?
Bane wrote:
> cipro wrote:
> Speaking of which, do you watch a show called Time Commanders? It's
> a
> game show where a team of people have to cammand armies in
> historical
> battles, but here's the thing, I'm sure the show uses Rome: Total
> War
> to recreate these battles, and if that's the case then it's looking
> very good indeed.
>
> No. What channel/when is it on?
It was on Thursadays on BBC 2, but I think it's now changed to Mondays, same channel but it's on around 6.45 pm.
Last week they had the elephant units on, they looked great, charged into a group of pikemen and started to throw them up in the air. In fact the graphics are amazing, animation is superb and the battle look as frantic and bloody and Shogun and Medieval combined.
> cipro wrote:
> Speaking of which, do you watch a show called Time Commanders? It's
> a
> game show where a team of people have to cammand armies in
> historical
> battles, but here's the thing, I'm sure the show uses Rome: Total
> War
> to recreate these battles, and if that's the case then it's looking
> very good indeed.
>
> No. What channel/when is it on?
It was on Thursadays on BBC 2, but I think it's now changed to Mondays, same channel but it's on around 6.45 pm.
Last week they had the elephant units on, they looked great, charged into a group of pikemen and started to throw them up in the air. In fact the graphics are amazing, animation is superb and the battle look as frantic and bloody and Shogun and Medieval combined.
Page: