Viewing Thread:
"Is the Sparkle GeForce II/ 64Mb 200/400 any good?"

I've just got myself a Sparkle GeForce II/400 MX 64Mb.I've installed it into my 1.3Ghz AMD and It scored a benchmark of 1,745 (3d mark 2001) first time with
the drivers provided. I've now installed Via 4 in 1 & Detonator 3, and it's now up
to 1,900 mark. I've also got the GeForce tweak utility, and will try to tweak it up
a bit.

Question: Is this a decent mark for a 64Mb Geforce II?

Has anyone else got this card or similar?, and if you've got 3d mark 2001, what
score are you getting?

People today rely to heavily on benchmarks. If it plays games how you want it to, then who cares how well it does on a benchmark.

Anyone concerned whether your 3dmark is good or not really should use Madonions comparison facility ( given the option once the benchmark is complete ). This is far more accurate that we could ever summise.

It's about what I'd expect from a GF2mx...It's a fairly intensive benchmark, and heavily GeForce3 optimised. I daren't run it on this box at the moment for fear of embaressment, I will after my upgrades..

I've just got myself a Sparkle GeForce II/400 MX 64Mb.I've installed it into my 1.3Ghz AMD and It scored a benchmark of 1,745 (3d mark 2001) first time with
the drivers provided. I've now installed Via 4 in 1 & Detonator 3, and it's now up
to 1,900 mark. I've also got the GeForce tweak utility, and will try to tweak it up
a bit.

Question: Is this a decent mark for a 64Mb Geforce II?

Has anyone else got this card or similar?, and if you've got 3d mark 2001, what
score are you getting?