The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
The title refers to a comment once made on the forum...
But getting to gaming, what are the most stupid things in games? Is it the repetative "on the day of the incident"/"I understand" quotes that Ryo keeps using? Is it the fact the badies always leave guns in wooden boxes for you to pick up?
What is it?
But getting to gaming, what are the most stupid things in games? Is it the repetative "on the day of the incident"/"I understand" quotes that Ryo keeps using? Is it the fact the badies always leave guns in wooden boxes for you to pick up?
What is it?
I tried to reply to your post and give my own view on what things were stupid in games. Hence the Zelda arrows thingy.
:-)
:-)
Shocktrooper wrote:
> yeah, you're virtually saying that games should be like real life -
> 100% interaction. I don't think it will happen just as yet
> :-(
Like, instead of finding arrows in pots - you could just pick
> your old ones up after you visit the villages' local blacksmiths
> (where you first got the arrows).
That would be purely class
> gaming.
NO! I just want to know what things in games you think are stupid... like Ryo always saying "hmmm... I see." To everything!
oh... hold on... were u being serious by you comments? Because that would make a cool game!
> yeah, you're virtually saying that games should be like real life -
> 100% interaction. I don't think it will happen just as yet
> :-(
Like, instead of finding arrows in pots - you could just pick
> your old ones up after you visit the villages' local blacksmiths
> (where you first got the arrows).
That would be purely class
> gaming.
NO! I just want to know what things in games you think are stupid... like Ryo always saying "hmmm... I see." To everything!
oh... hold on... were u being serious by you comments? Because that would make a cool game!
yeah, you're virtually saying that games should be like real life - 100% interaction. I don't think it will happen just as yet :-(
Like, instead of finding arrows in pots - you could just pick your old ones up after you visit the villages' local blacksmiths (where you first got the arrows).
That would be purely class gaming.
Like, instead of finding arrows in pots - you could just pick your old ones up after you visit the villages' local blacksmiths (where you first got the arrows).
That would be purely class gaming.
The whole point of games is that they are interactive entertainment. However, in the early days, full interaction was impossible. So turn based fighting was made. This is basicaly a chess game. Computer moves. You see it, you move. etc. The whole point was that when powerful processors came out the whole idea would end... but OH NO!
While Ninty are developing the brilliant combat system in zelda, square are still using turn based combat! Why? It's no more than a game of chess! How about an interactive fighting system, but with massive special effects for spells. That's the goal isn't it?
While Ninty are developing the brilliant combat system in zelda, square are still using turn based combat! Why? It's no more than a game of chess! How about an interactive fighting system, but with massive special effects for spells. That's the goal isn't it?
The title refers to a comment once made on the forum...
But getting to gaming, what are the most stupid things in games? Is it the repetative "on the day of the incident"/"I understand" quotes that Ryo keeps using? Is it the fact the badies always leave guns in wooden boxes for you to pick up?
What is it?
But getting to gaming, what are the most stupid things in games? Is it the repetative "on the day of the incident"/"I understand" quotes that Ryo keeps using? Is it the fact the badies always leave guns in wooden boxes for you to pick up?
What is it?