The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Or are there just too many good games out there now to rate it that highly?
Personally, for pure addictiveness, I'd rank it in the top 50 only, but I'd need a lot of time to think about it to be really sure.
I can't stand games that consist of one screen, if you know what I mean.
If I can't "go" somewhere in a game - around the next corner, into a mysterious building etc - I always think I may as well play Connect 4 or twiddle with a Rubik's cube.
I'm like you FM, I'd set FF7 as a bench mark. Though I think "Zelda: Ocarina of time" may well beat it. But FF7 comes in a very close second on my top 20. It does however, share that second spot with Secret of Mana.
from there I'm pretty much lost as to what 4-20 would be??
If I had been older, and had seen it as an original, had seen that nothing else compared to it, then I might rate it higher.
And besides, when doing 'Top X' lists, I always leave something out, and feel terrible!
Very few would go above it, many would go below it, but that's the one I usually set the standard with.
I suppose everyone has a benchmark game like that.
Or are there just too many good games out there now to rate it that highly?
Personally, for pure addictiveness, I'd rank it in the top 50 only, but I'd need a lot of time to think about it to be really sure.