Viewing Thread:
"Jurasic Park 3 ..... is it good ?"

Well is it ? I was thinking of going to see that or Tomb Raider , which ones better ?

SHEEPY's got the right idea, JP1 will always be the best.

JP1 - The best as it was first, orignial and great effects for its time

JP2 - *cough* 'orrible

JP3 - I thought it rocked, not as good as JP1... plot was predictable, one of those guessing what happens next and being told to shut the eff up :D

I'm tired

The_Vottanator wrote:
> CJC wrote:
> Out of all the "Jurassic Park" movies the
> first one was
> the best, the 2nd and 3rd are just movies based
> around the first
> one......


.....but the first third one
> is better than the second one. Hehe.

??? Brain can't take this confusion!

:-(

CJC wrote:
> Out of all the "Jurassic Park" movies the first one was
> the best, the 2nd and 3rd are just movies based around the first
> one......


.....but the first third one is better than the second one. Hehe.

:)

Out of all the "Jurassic Park" movies the first one was the best, the 2nd and 3rd are just movies based around the first one.

It's good. I thought the Lost World was awful but I loved the first one. JP3 is much better than the second but no where near as good as the first.

I think I will still go and see it anyway. If I have a spare couple of hours.

ARGH!

I meant ACTION, not acting.

ACTION!!!

Jurassic Park 3 is poor in my opinion.

One of my favourite ever films was Jurrasic Park-as I love Dinosaurs.

The Lost World was good, but not brilliant.

JP3 was disappointing. WAY too much acting, a bit of talking always does the trick (like in JP3 when eat dinner, and when they're talking to Hammond,) and it seemed so short for some reason!

I'm sorry, but JP3 just didn't do it for me.

Swordfish is cool!