The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'The Sims : Bustin Out'.
I have said it many times and i do believe that The Sims Bustin' Out is the worst sequel ever, no improvements have been made to it apart from the ability to move out, which isn't that great
What do you lot think the worst ever sequel??
*waits intently for a reply*
I meant the 'worst sequel to a game ever!!!!!'
What do you lot think the worst ever sequel??
*waits intently for a reply*
I meant the 'worst sequel to a game ever!!!!!'
Page:
Maverick42 wrote:
> What? That doesn't even make any sense!
What I meant is that disappointment is just a factor to every body except me, to me it's everything.
> What? That doesn't even make any sense!
What I meant is that disappointment is just a factor to every body except me, to me it's everything.
What? That doesn't even make any sense!
Maverick42 wrote:
> That's not the point.
>
> FIFA 2002 was a sequel, so was Metal Gear Solid 2. FIFA's the poorer
> of those games, so if asked "what's the worst sequel?",
> it's logical to say FIFA. Disappointment is a factor, but it doesn't
> rule the decision.
Well, to me, a sequal is only a sequal when it's up to the expectations.
> That's not the point.
>
> FIFA 2002 was a sequel, so was Metal Gear Solid 2. FIFA's the poorer
> of those games, so if asked "what's the worst sequel?",
> it's logical to say FIFA. Disappointment is a factor, but it doesn't
> rule the decision.
Well, to me, a sequal is only a sequal when it's up to the expectations.
That's not the point.
FIFA 2002 was a sequel, so was Metal Gear Solid 2. FIFA's the poorer of those games, so if asked "what's the worst sequel?", it's logical to say FIFA. Disappointment is a factor, but it doesn't rule the decision.
FIFA 2002 was a sequel, so was Metal Gear Solid 2. FIFA's the poorer of those games, so if asked "what's the worst sequel?", it's logical to say FIFA. Disappointment is a factor, but it doesn't rule the decision.
Maverick42 wrote:
> Are you all out of your minds?
>
> Metal Gear Solid 2 wasn't as good as the first, but it had a hell of
> a lot going for it. It was a very enjoyable and very varied game to
> play, incredibly satisfying and had a surprising amount of replay
> value. What niggles it had could be overlooked in light of the
> enhanced gameplay mechanics, superbly created atmosphere and that
> "professional" feeling as you executed various manouveurs.
> The storyline had a few holes and the cut scenes were rather too
> long, but few can deny it wasn't compelling from the offset and that
> the characters were colourful and vibrant.
>
> Worst sequel ever? You may have been disappointed, but there's no way
> in hell this is the worst ever - it's quite easily an 8/10 game
> which, in my books, is damn good. Vice City, for example, carried the
> same level of disappointment for me, but that didn't make it a bad
> game. There's so much more rubbish out there that you're spoilt for
> choice - games like FIFA 2002 were massive steps backwards and poor
> to play, why not vote for something like that that deserves it?
Because we weren't expecting Fifa 2002 to be good in the first place, so we weren't disappointed.
> Are you all out of your minds?
>
> Metal Gear Solid 2 wasn't as good as the first, but it had a hell of
> a lot going for it. It was a very enjoyable and very varied game to
> play, incredibly satisfying and had a surprising amount of replay
> value. What niggles it had could be overlooked in light of the
> enhanced gameplay mechanics, superbly created atmosphere and that
> "professional" feeling as you executed various manouveurs.
> The storyline had a few holes and the cut scenes were rather too
> long, but few can deny it wasn't compelling from the offset and that
> the characters were colourful and vibrant.
>
> Worst sequel ever? You may have been disappointed, but there's no way
> in hell this is the worst ever - it's quite easily an 8/10 game
> which, in my books, is damn good. Vice City, for example, carried the
> same level of disappointment for me, but that didn't make it a bad
> game. There's so much more rubbish out there that you're spoilt for
> choice - games like FIFA 2002 were massive steps backwards and poor
> to play, why not vote for something like that that deserves it?
Because we weren't expecting Fifa 2002 to be good in the first place, so we weren't disappointed.
Maverick42 wrote:
> Think along these lines - I'm surprised nobody's mentioned Angel of
> Darkness either.
So am I. But I hate all Tomb Raider games.
> Think along these lines - I'm surprised nobody's mentioned Angel of
> Darkness either.
So am I. But I hate all Tomb Raider games.
That's more like it.
Think along these lines - I'm surprised nobody's mentioned Angel of Darkness either.
Think along these lines - I'm surprised nobody's mentioned Angel of Darkness either.
Electrum wrote:
> Sorry worst sequel has to be Devil may cry 2.
I'm going to change my vote. Metal Gear Solid 2 was not as good as the original but DMC 2 was no where near as good as the original. I vote for Devil May Cry 2.
> Sorry worst sequel has to be Devil may cry 2.
I'm going to change my vote. Metal Gear Solid 2 was not as good as the original but DMC 2 was no where near as good as the original. I vote for Devil May Cry 2.
i think both Sons of liberty and Vice city were fantastic sequels, and as good as I could have hoped for.
Sorry worst sequel has to be Devil may cry 2.
Terrible. Terrible. terrible.
Sorry worst sequel has to be Devil may cry 2.
Terrible. Terrible. terrible.
Are you all out of your minds?
Metal Gear Solid 2 wasn't as good as the first, but it had a hell of a lot going for it. It was a very enjoyable and very varied game to play, incredibly satisfying and had a surprising amount of replay value. What niggles it had could be overlooked in light of the enhanced gameplay mechanics, superbly created atmosphere and that "professional" feeling as you executed various manouveurs. The storyline had a few holes and the cut scenes were rather too long, but few can deny it wasn't compelling from the offset and that the characters were colourful and vibrant.
Worst sequel ever? You may have been disappointed, but there's no way in hell this is the worst ever - it's quite easily an 8/10 game which, in my books, is damn good. Vice City, for example, carried the same level of disappointment for me, but that didn't make it a bad game. There's so much more rubbish out there that you're spoilt for choice - games like FIFA 2002 were massive steps backwards and poor to play, why not vote for something like that that deserves it?
Metal Gear Solid 2 wasn't as good as the first, but it had a hell of a lot going for it. It was a very enjoyable and very varied game to play, incredibly satisfying and had a surprising amount of replay value. What niggles it had could be overlooked in light of the enhanced gameplay mechanics, superbly created atmosphere and that "professional" feeling as you executed various manouveurs. The storyline had a few holes and the cut scenes were rather too long, but few can deny it wasn't compelling from the offset and that the characters were colourful and vibrant.
Worst sequel ever? You may have been disappointed, but there's no way in hell this is the worst ever - it's quite easily an 8/10 game which, in my books, is damn good. Vice City, for example, carried the same level of disappointment for me, but that didn't make it a bad game. There's so much more rubbish out there that you're spoilt for choice - games like FIFA 2002 were massive steps backwards and poor to play, why not vote for something like that that deserves it?
Page: