The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Just watched the trailer and its looking to be one of the games of 2004, this time you can nick enemies weapons, speed up time instead of slowing it down and lots more.
I dunno if you've seen this trailer or not so here it is anyway :
[URL]http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/action/princeofpersia2/media.html[/URL]
The screenshots also look great - [URL]http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/action/princeofpersia2/screenindex.html[/URL]
I cant wait to see more videos!
> Granted Zelda looked immense (as did/does Resident Evil 4) but
> outside of that Nintendo were once again looking at the hand held
> market to bring them out on top.
While I do have to say, I'm really looking forward to Halo 2, Half-Life 2 Conker and a few others, with games like Zelda, Prime 2, Resident Evil 4 and Pikmin 2 on Nintendo's horizon, all absolute killer games, I can't help but favour my cube over any of the other systems when it comes to E3.
Even if the XBox will get me through the summer.
You would rather wait 6 months than spend £30 on a quality game?
Granted Zelda looked immense (as did/does Resident Evil 4) but outside of that Nintendo were once again looking at the hand held market to bring them out on top. I have an SP and enjoy playing it now and again but it doesn't have the draw of a next generation console and will be played when I'm not interested in booting up all the shiznits and sitting down for long periods to play games, at the end of the day though it remains a hand held console used for very casual gaming.
Everyone seems to be taken away with the PSP and DS, at the end of the day they are hand held consoles, a niche market which Sony are going to turn into a mass market, when they do you will see Microsoft there no doubt, aside from that though I thought console wise the Xbox had the most interesting line-up outside of the PC.
> "Microsoft just didn't compete with Sony and Nintendo this
> year. The new Xbox Live stuff is great, but Microsoft needed
> something big to take on the PSP and new Zelda and they didn't have
> it"
>
> Hmmm...I dont think SO.
But they didn't. Everyone knew what to expect from Halo 2, as great as it looks, it's nothing new. Unless you count 'double weapons'. Which I don't.
If it was last year, XBox's line-up and games on show would have seemed great, but Sony and Nintendo's line-up's were too stong for a weak XBox booth. With Sony showing off their PSP and Nintendo with probably the best E3 booth ever, Microsoft needed to pull something big out to compete.
As for Black Arrow, it's not broken so I fail to see a need to fix it. Yes it looks EXACTLY the same as Rainbow Six 3 only with very very few extra weapons and full LIVE support (voice messaging etc) but it does have two excellent new online modes, one where you have to take control of 3 different areas and one where you have to steal something and work as a team to get back to the exit point. Like the producer said, in Rainbow Six 3 very little team work was used online which sort of goes against everything that Rainbow Six games are about. This however will change massively with these new online modes and from the Beta testers at the moment the infiltrate and escape mode is currently their favourite online section, even more so than Team Deathmatch.
I am personally awaiting Rainbow Six 4 on the PC but I am still highly looking forward to Black Arrow. If you are stupid enough to let the fact they aren't going to gut the engine and start a fresh get in the way of getting what will be the biggest LIVE title yet then that's your problem, everyone else will be playing it and after the massively enjoyable success that was Rainbow Six 3 it's either buy it or miss out on LIVE play for a good few months.
Well I still dont get why they're doing this new Rainbow Six...
It looks exactly like the first but supports Live 3.0 - WOW, im really gonna spend £30 on that...