The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> Mr goat!
I'm not saying that Britney's music is good, or what she
> stands for is good (well she prbably doesn't stand for anything),
> but her image has been created very well, and the team of people
> behind her have done a damn good job and presenting our
> Britney.
It's all money isn't it. And if they make it, who's to
> say that is wrong? They are doing what they are intending.
I used
> to go on the principles of not liking things by the way they were
> produced, but in the end why bother?
I accept the sad pop
> commercial industry now and actually can nod my head and hum to the
> bad tunes of the manufacturaed groups. I do enojoy lots of aspects
> of every genre of music.
So the product that is Britney is fab.
> It's pure pop.
When I saw Britney last year at Manchester it was excellent but also totally different to most other concerts I had been too. Originally I went because like most males I think she is absolutley drop dead gorgeous. While at the concert I discovered how POP music can be fun. Just Imagine the scene thousands of people of all ages crammed into one massive venue with a scantly clad Brintney on satge performing "happy sing along tunes" with about a dozen backing singers/dancers combind with a lights, lasers and enough special effects to make a pink Floyd concert look dull.
In conclusion, for at least one night I forgot my roots in "serious" music and idolised Britany Spears as a true Queen of Pop music.
> Mr goat!
I'm not saying that Britney's music is good, or what she
> stands for is good (well she prbably doesn't stand for anything),
> but her image has been created very well, and the team of people
> behind her have done a damn good job and presenting our
> Britney.
It's all money isn't it. And if they make it, who's to
> say that is wrong? They are doing what they are intending.
I used
> to go on the principles of not liking things by the way they were
> produced, but in the end why bother?
I accept the sad pop
> commercial industry now and actually can nod my head and hum to the
> bad tunes of the manufacturaed groups. I do enojoy lots of aspects
> of every genre of music.
So the product that is Britney is fab.
> It's pure pop.
so u exceppt the pop industrys but not bands that made it by them eslf and actually make up there own songs play live and play there iwn instruments ur strange
i think the queen of pop is got to be...... Christina Aguilera she better than britney
I'm not saying that Britney's music is good, or what she stands for is good (well she prbably doesn't stand for anything), but her image has been created very well, and the team of people behind her have done a damn good job and presenting our Britney.
It's all money isn't it. And if they make it, who's to say that is wrong? They are doing what they are intending.
I used to go on the principles of not liking things by the way they were produced, but in the end why bother?
I accept the sad pop commercial industry now and actually can nod my head and hum to the bad tunes of the manufacturaed groups. I do enojoy lots of aspects of every genre of music.
So the product that is Britney is fab. It's pure pop.
> I vote Goatboy for the queen of pop. :-)
Honestly, Kylie Minogue
> deserves a mention.
She's been releasing pop music since 1988,
> and I doubt whether Britney ad Christina will still be around in 5
> years time!
Klyie has re-invented herself so many times, and made
> comeback after comeback. After her Stock?, Aitken?, and Waterman
> days, people said she was finished, but she proved them
> wrong.
And she has a nice bum.
Apart from Madona Kylie is the only Pop babe I fancied nearly 10 years ago and Still do even more today.