The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Hur hur. 1-0. Wonder what Jose will say.
Good night for 'Pool, Morientes & the Djib on the scoresheet. Shame Crouch is cack.
Good night for 'Pool, Morientes & the Djib on the scoresheet. Shame Crouch is cack.
Page:
£7m + Morientes is what I heard for Joaquin...
Stryke wrote:
> Why must Rafa insist he doesn't want Joaquin,
> But no, Rafa must abandon all this to buy Simao for 2-3 million
> cheaper.
I think Joaquin will cost a bit more than 2-3 million more than simao...
> Why must Rafa insist he doesn't want Joaquin,
> But no, Rafa must abandon all this to buy Simao for 2-3 million
> cheaper.
I think Joaquin will cost a bit more than 2-3 million more than simao...
He would get first team action, they don't really have any other right sided players. Garcia can play pretty well there, but he's left footed and prefers playing in the middle. It's good to have someone at least right-footed.
It is a bit odd to reject a player who would be an improvement to your squad who wants to join as well in favour of bringing in a player who probably wouldn't get regular first team action.
Why must Rafa insist he doesn't want Joaquin, when he's one of the most gifted right-wingers around and has openly said he wants to come to Liverpool and, bonus points for this, he's all-the-way-munch-that-paella Spanish to his core. Andalucian till he dies, Rafa.
But no, Rafa must abandon all this to buy Simao for 2-3 million cheaper. To play on the right, even though he's exactly the same as Garcia and plays best behind a front man.
Muuuh.
But no, Rafa must abandon all this to buy Simao for 2-3 million cheaper. To play on the right, even though he's exactly the same as Garcia and plays best behind a front man.
Muuuh.
Colourless wrote:
> I used to think Joaquin was good.
Get out of my time-space continuum.
> I used to think Joaquin was good.
Get out of my time-space continuum.
hippyman wrote:
> As a neutral spectator, I feel Chelsea were robbed. The ref was so
> biased to RB. Dani was tripping over his own ego - at the expense of
> Chelsea.
Ah. Someone else did watch the game.
> I must admit, Gallas and Drogba should've been penalised more -
> surely by a red?
Not really. Gallas pushed him in the back. He went down holding his head... With Drogba, was a stupid tackle - deserved a yellow, and suddenly the keeper pushes him (should have been booked and therefore sent off....)
> As a neutral spectator, I feel Chelsea were robbed. The ref was so
> biased to RB. Dani was tripping over his own ego - at the expense of
> Chelsea.
Ah. Someone else did watch the game.
> I must admit, Gallas and Drogba should've been penalised more -
> surely by a red?
Not really. Gallas pushed him in the back. He went down holding his head... With Drogba, was a stupid tackle - deserved a yellow, and suddenly the keeper pushes him (should have been booked and therefore sent off....)
Dringo wrote:
> Lol bless Stryke and his wasted tirades.
--
Beer has nothing to do with Crouch-hatred.
> Lol bless Stryke and his wasted tirades.
--
Beer has nothing to do with Crouch-hatred.
Still Liverpool are virtually qualified now anyway.
Bloody typical. The one time I actually want Chelsea to win they lose.
Page: