Viewing Thread:
"Notables to Be Demoted! : )"

I dont have anything against Notables, in fact Ant and Grix are friends of mine. But I do think Notables should be demoted.
They should be demoted for things like, being rude, annoying or picking on Newbies or JAT's or even Regulars.

Every two months there should be and Election on who should be demoted. Otherwise one day there'll be far to many Notables and the newbies of today wont be able to be a Notable.

Does anyone feel the same way about this subject or feels the opposite. Please say.

P.S. PLEASE DO NOT THINK THAT I HAVE SOMETHING AGAINST ANY OF THE NOTABLES, THEY ARE ALL AN ACE CHOICE!

:)

I dont have anything against Notables, in fact Ant and Grix are friends of mine. But I do think Notables should be demoted.
They should be demoted for things like, being rude, annoying or picking on Newbies or JAT's or even Regulars.

Every two months there should be and Election on who should be demoted. Otherwise one day there'll be far to many Notables and the newbies of today wont be able to be a Notable.

Does anyone feel the same way about this subject or feels the opposite. Please say.

P.S. PLEASE DO NOT THINK THAT I HAVE SOMETHING AGAINST ANY OF THE NOTABLES, THEY ARE ALL AN ACE CHOICE!

:)

Didn't we talk about this last nite? Anyways I think it is a good idea although they shouldn't be demoted for stupid one off things like arguing with someone. I think that maybe the amount off notables should remain at 6 as that is an okay no. Mind you some of the Newbies I have seen definately should never become notables.

MJswerve wrote:
> Didn't we talk about this last nite? Anyways I think it is a good
> idea although they shouldn't be demoted for stupid one off things
> like arguing with someone. I think that maybe the amount off
> notables should remain at 6 as that is an okay no. Mind you some of
> the Newbies I have seen definately should never become notables.

***************
Good point MJ, i dont think Notables should be demoted if they have the occasional arguement. It's just if there always rude or something like that.

And one of thos newbies wouldnt be referred to me would it???

ARHGGGGGHH! JATS's everywhere!......

Not everyone will be a notable, of course, but if someone steps down, should another person be voted in their place?

Time_Warp wrote:
> ARHGGGGGHH! JATS's everywhere!......

MJ shouldnt b a JAT TW. And you know that i'm not really a JAt as i've bee on SR much longer than 1 day.

Grix Thraves wrote:
> Not everyone will be a notable, of course, but if someone steps
> down, should another person be voted in their place?

********
I think they should Grix, Like MJ said 6 should be the Max. The Notables are like the head of SR, and should be rolemodels. So they shouldnt be rude or anything lik that.

Youv'e got to ask yourself. Do you feel lucky? Well do ya? PUNK!

TW you disgrace the name regular. I am a regular as well and I would never insult anyone about being a JAT. Other than Spider as he shouldn't be one either so I am just joking. Check peoples stats before insulting someone. Oh and how is 2 JATs all over the place?

Well put MJ, but I'd just like to say that TW and me are mates. Once u get past he's witty remarks he's alright :)

A Notable will remain a notable, but if they disappear then we might elect a few more.

But there is only one Tony

Tony is the only Tony

Only Tony is the Tony