Viewing Thread:
"**GTA SAN ANDREAS INFO**"

CJ Dies.


Spoiler.

Limmar wrote:
> well come on, u could only see from the sky,

or in other words *the graphics sucked* Gameplay>>>>>>>Graphics

> you couldnt kill.

Yup couldn't kill at all, i guess all that red stuff lying around people you run over and shoot was just a bit of ketchup they had in their pockets

it was
> crap, the verdict from ppl i know is that it was the worst game
> ever.

Play it yourself then give a proper, actually informed, verdict on it.

Limmar wrote:
> well come on, u could only see from the sky, you couldnt kill. it was
> crap, the verdict from ppl i know is that it was the worst game
> ever.

You can kill and this was the start, if we hadn't bought it there would be no sequels. loads of people did.

Nah

They'll be talking about the PS2 GTA trilogy

There'll be bound to be numerous sequels on the next generation of consoles.

I thought they had already confimed they were working on a GTA title for the next Sony console.

Cid Vilante wrote:
> Well I think Mr friend is right. If you don't do well in the game,
> e.g, you get shot a lot and your health goes down, then your
> character dies.
>
> So simple really.

So like all the other GTA games and alot of other games then. Like I said, so simple to see.

About CJ dying, if it does happen, which is a possibility, Then i see it happening like FFX - it just isnt saved. Or perhaps it is saved to give you a couple more percent but you restart at the mission start point, allowing you to continue as you like.

I don't believe him anyway, but just a suggestion.

Limmar wrote:
> "Classic" = old. GTA1 was from what i heard totaly rubbish.

I've got all games in the GTA series, and GTA1 is not rubbish. So what if it was top down, it was great fun. I still play GTA3 with the top down view sometimes, it's kinda nostalgic.

:)

How can anyone (and I mean Limmar) think that GTA 1 is rubbish. It was such a fantastic game when it was released. Compared to todays games the graphics are rubbish but the game play was, and still is, excellent. The other GTA games are pretty much all the same as the first one only with better graphics. there are features i remember from the first that have never been replicated in any of the sequals and probably never will be to the same effect.

You should try is yourself rather than taking your imaginary friends word for it

ßulle†† wrote:
> But...but...SAMUEL!!!111

spoiler














dont watch the next star wars film if you dont like seeing him die...but i must admit he is too cool to kill off in any movie!...wait is this even a spoiler???














end of spoiler

Limmar wrote:
> gr13ve wrote:
> Limmar wrote:
> If he dies it is going 2 be at the very end of the game when you
> have
> fully completed it or something. Like you get killed by a rival gang
> member after 100% completed. Could be a good ending sceen, big shoot
> out. But i doubt it. becuase GTA has always been an everlaster.
>
> If that was the case I'd be fine, I can never be bothered to look
> for
> all the packages, rampages ect ect.
> I said 100% that means packages, rampages, everything 100% completed

Yes....and I said I wouldnt get 100% complete because I wouldn't look for all the packages.