Viewing Thread:
"Charlie's Angels 2: Full Throttle review."

Muh mu muuuh, muuuh muu. Muuuh muuuh mu muuh mu: muuuuuuuh? Muh muh muh, mu muuuh mu mu muuuh! Mu! Muh!! MUH!!! Muh muh muh muh muh muuuuuuuuh. Mu, muh muh muuuh muh muuuh. Muh muh muh muh, muh muh mu muuuuh muuuh muuuuh. Muh! Muuh muuuh muh mu muuh, muh muh muuuh, muh muh uuuh dur! Muuh muh muuuuh muuuh: crumbs! Mu muuuuh muh muh muuh.

Muuuuh muh muuuuh muh muuuuh. Muh, muuuuh muuh muuuuh muh, muh...muh! Muh? Muh muuuh muuuuuuuuh mu muuuuuuh. Muuh, muuuuh, muuuuh muuh muuuh. Muuuuh muuuh muuuh! Muh muh, muuuh muuh muuh muuuuuuh. Muuuuh mu mu muuuh muuuuuh muh. Muuuh, muuuh - muuuuh muh muuh:

1. Muuuuh
2. Muuuuuuh
3. Muuuh muuuh

Muuuh muuh muh. Muuuuuuuh, muuuuh muh muuh. Muuuuuh, muh muh muh. Muuuuuuuh muh mu mu muh.

Muuuuh: muuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh!

It's about as useful as a toilet that fires masonry drills upwards at your ring.

I liked the 1st one, it was fluffy comedy with Tim Curry saying "Can we get a move on Yoko?" and Sam Rockwell being evil and dancing in an evil way and Bill Murray with a soapgun.
And Crispin Glover as the creepy guy

Haven't seen the 2nd one, don't think I need to really.

It's one of the worst films I've ever seen.

Well, the beginning was awful, the ending was utter garbage and the less said about the middle the better. Otherwise, top class stuff...

Personally I saw the first one many times whilst working at a cinema.

Very entertaining.

They are both such terrible films.

Meka Dragon wrote:
> monkey_man wrote:
> Sub-xXx, which is quite an undertaking. Most soulless, heartless,
> joyless film I've ever witnessed.
>
> See, I really didn't get on with xXx, as I thought it took itself
> seriously. Charlies Angels I don't think did. or at least it didn't
> come across as doing so.

Both rubbish. All rubbish. Everything is rubbish. It's like those films we watched in the 80's that had rollerblades, and other fancy new inventions like that - nobody wants to remember them. These are the CGI equivalent.

> This may worry you. I have both Charlies Angels movies on DVD -
> weirdly they're next to Se7en anf Fight Club. I saw Charlies Angels 2
> at the cinema.

You ARE Snuggly.

monkey_man wrote:
> Sub-xXx, which is quite an undertaking. Most soulless, heartless,
> joyless film I've ever witnessed.

See, I really didn't get on with xXx, as I thought it took itself seriously. Charlies Angels I don't think did. or at least it didn't come across as doing so.

And that bloke's Oirish accent was hilarious.

This may worry you. I have both Charlies Angels movies on DVD - weirdly they're next to Se7en anf Fight Club. I saw Charlies Angels 2 at the cinema.

Sub-xXx, which is quite an undertaking. Most soulless, heartless, joyless film I've ever witnessed.

First one's funny.

Had some cool but daft fights.