The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005300127,00.html[/URL]
Because, y'know, as they keep saying, he's a monster and everything.
Was anyone's life really enriched by seeing pictures of Saddam in his pants? Did it genuinely make anyone feel different about their feelings toward him? No one wants to see pictures of an old man in his pants, doesn't matter who it is.
I remember there were briefly pictures of George W. Bush in his pants that were removed without trace not so long ago, the speed in which they were taken down was amazing.
I forget my point. I'm hungry.
Because, y'know, as they keep saying, he's a monster and everything.
Was anyone's life really enriched by seeing pictures of Saddam in his pants? Did it genuinely make anyone feel different about their feelings toward him? No one wants to see pictures of an old man in his pants, doesn't matter who it is.
I remember there were briefly pictures of George W. Bush in his pants that were removed without trace not so long ago, the speed in which they were taken down was amazing.
I forget my point. I'm hungry.
Edgy wrote:
> Heh, you could call it his 'trial' run
Heh.
Arnie: Here's your trial...
*Flashes automatic weapon*
Arnie: Run!
*Budda budda budda*
> Heh, you could call it his 'trial' run
Heh.
Arnie: Here's your trial...
*Flashes automatic weapon*
Arnie: Run!
*Budda budda budda*
I really he sues them and wins, money is no good to a dead man but if it annoys The Scum i'm all for it.
Heh, you could call it his 'trial' run
Saddam has no right to sue anyone. The moment he steps into a court, he'll be killed.
hopefully
hopefully
I think it would be rather amusing for a paper like The Sun to acquire photos of Mugabe in his underwear and to accidentally drop the pictures around the most inhabited towns in Zimbabwe.
It would cause far more damage to him than those pics have done to Saddam.
It would cause far more damage to him than those pics have done to Saddam.
The overall fact of it is Saddam is a small version of hell and The Sun finds it neccessary to publicize to the world that he's hating it because they think it'll make the public happy. It's a stupid cause.
Regardless to all this though, I still set the picture of him washing his pants as my desktop wallpaper. Saddam is hAwT!!!11$$@*&
Regardless to all this though, I still set the picture of him washing his pants as my desktop wallpaper. Saddam is hAwT!!!11$$@*&
When's televised trial and live pay-per-view public execution...
Saddam in his pants turned me gay.
And I imagine the whole fiasco could well be worth more than that million to the Sun if he does try to sue.
And I imagine the whole fiasco could well be worth more than that million to the Sun if he does try to sue.
[URL]http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005300127,00.html[/URL]
Because, y'know, as they keep saying, he's a monster and everything.
Was anyone's life really enriched by seeing pictures of Saddam in his pants? Did it genuinely make anyone feel different about their feelings toward him? No one wants to see pictures of an old man in his pants, doesn't matter who it is.
I remember there were briefly pictures of George W. Bush in his pants that were removed without trace not so long ago, the speed in which they were taken down was amazing.
I forget my point. I'm hungry.
Because, y'know, as they keep saying, he's a monster and everything.
Was anyone's life really enriched by seeing pictures of Saddam in his pants? Did it genuinely make anyone feel different about their feelings toward him? No one wants to see pictures of an old man in his pants, doesn't matter who it is.
I remember there were briefly pictures of George W. Bush in his pants that were removed without trace not so long ago, the speed in which they were taken down was amazing.
I forget my point. I'm hungry.