The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
They bloody got over this!
[URL]http://www.spurs.co.uk/article.asp?hlid=284989[/URL]
[URL]http://www.spurs.co.uk/article.asp?hlid=284989[/URL]
Page:
Yeah, the article said it was a great piece of skill to chip the keeper from there, when he didn't. He kicked it straight to Carroll, not over him. Pah retard.
But... it wasn't a good goal.
Carroll caught it, then threw it over his shoulder.
Carroll caught it, then threw it over his shoulder.
SHEEPY wrote:
> It more crappy keeping than a good goal.
Yes, but it should have still been allowed as a goal.
> It more crappy keeping than a good goal.
Yes, but it should have still been allowed as a goal.
SHEEPY wrote:
> It more crappy keeping than a good goal.
> It more crappy keeping than a good goal.
It more crappy keeping than a good goal.
Only Spurs fans would vote for this as there second best goal of the season, shows how few goals they manage to score :)
It wasn't even a goal...
Colourless wrote:
> I don't understand how this many people seem to just be browsing the
> Spurs.co.uk.
I can't vouch for anyone else, but i was looking at how many English players they have got. :D
> I don't understand how this many people seem to just be browsing the
> Spurs.co.uk.
I can't vouch for anyone else, but i was looking at how many English players they have got. :D
Who needs reminding of that January night at Old Trafford?
No one because Spurs fans won't stop whining about it.
Ah well it was their cup final. I just find it amusing that a supposed 'big' team, as they love to keep saying they are, can't get over it.
No one because Spurs fans won't stop whining about it.
Ah well it was their cup final. I just find it amusing that a supposed 'big' team, as they love to keep saying they are, can't get over it.
I don't understand how this many people seem to just be browsing the Spurs.co.uk.
Page: