The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://www.bereitsgesehen.de/doombild.htm[/URL]
Looks like it's shaping up to be what I expected it to be, a low budget, power station corridor crawl just like every other microbudget post Alien ripoff.
This is going to be a hundredweight of prime turkey. Craptalular.
Looks like it's shaping up to be what I expected it to be, a low budget, power station corridor crawl just like every other microbudget post Alien ripoff.
This is going to be a hundredweight of prime turkey. Craptalular.
Page:
Pandaemonium wrote:
> Emilio Estevez, Rene Russo, Anthony Hopkins and........Mick Jagger,
> whos acting made Jon Voights lear in "Anaconda" look like a
> performance out of the Royal Shakespeare Company.
-------
Oh man, I loved that film precisely because it was so bad.
Jagger sounds like a catarrh-afflicted Julian Clary.
"If you drink one drobathat water...I'm outofajob"
> Emilio Estevez, Rene Russo, Anthony Hopkins and........Mick Jagger,
> whos acting made Jon Voights lear in "Anaconda" look like a
> performance out of the Royal Shakespeare Company.
-------
Oh man, I loved that film precisely because it was so bad.
Jagger sounds like a catarrh-afflicted Julian Clary.
"If you drink one drobathat water...I'm outofajob"
Goatboy wrote:
> In which case you have to watch "Screamers"
Yup. It's terrible.
I had the same cinema experience with "Freejack"
Emilio Estevez, Rene Russo, Anthony Hopkins and........Mick Jagger, whos acting made Jon Voights lear in "Anaconda" look like a performance out of the Royal Shakespeare Company.
On the subject of bad movies, the worst special effect in existance is on a turkey called D.N.A. fast forward to 1h 25m in the movie. They rip off the lander crash from Aliens with a helicopter. You can almost see the guys hand bouncing the plastic model along the poorly made jungle set. It doesn't help that the greenscreen has thick black lines around the main actor.
> In which case you have to watch "Screamers"
Yup. It's terrible.
I had the same cinema experience with "Freejack"
Emilio Estevez, Rene Russo, Anthony Hopkins and........Mick Jagger, whos acting made Jon Voights lear in "Anaconda" look like a performance out of the Royal Shakespeare Company.
On the subject of bad movies, the worst special effect in existance is on a turkey called D.N.A. fast forward to 1h 25m in the movie. They rip off the lander crash from Aliens with a helicopter. You can almost see the guys hand bouncing the plastic model along the poorly made jungle set. It doesn't help that the greenscreen has thick black lines around the main actor.
Robocop in space? How could that be a bad film?
(Both queued for rental)
(Both queued for rental)
In which case you have to watch "Screamers"
3 of us saw it at the cinema and even the guy in the ticket booth was "Really? You sure?"
It was just us 3 in the cinema, it was awful awful film.
Peter Weller in some space-opera thing supposedly based on a Phillip K Dick novel but just made no sense.
The final, "ooooo it isn't over yet!!" typical shot these films love to do?
A teddybear in a spaceship turning to camera.
It's like watching a video of your asthmatic, bed ridden relative trying to get up to go to the toilet and ending up wetting themself sobbing silently.
It's painful to watch.
3 of us saw it at the cinema and even the guy in the ticket booth was "Really? You sure?"
It was just us 3 in the cinema, it was awful awful film.
Peter Weller in some space-opera thing supposedly based on a Phillip K Dick novel but just made no sense.
The final, "ooooo it isn't over yet!!" typical shot these films love to do?
A teddybear in a spaceship turning to camera.
It's like watching a video of your asthmatic, bed ridden relative trying to get up to go to the toilet and ending up wetting themself sobbing silently.
It's painful to watch.
monkey_man wrote:
> I'm really, really tempted to rent Alone In The Dark. Is it
> that bad?
It's appalling. Absoutely appalling. One of those movies you watch and think "Damn, I could do better than that..."
It's on for an hour and a half. When I watched it it seemed like it would never end.
Some people may say "Why waste your time and money?" But the fact remains, I love bad movies.
> I'm really, really tempted to rent Alone In The Dark. Is it
> that bad?
It's appalling. Absoutely appalling. One of those movies you watch and think "Damn, I could do better than that..."
It's on for an hour and a half. When I watched it it seemed like it would never end.
Some people may say "Why waste your time and money?" But the fact remains, I love bad movies.
It's not an award winner though is it?
And Uwe Boll is no John Carpenter.
And Uwe Boll is no John Carpenter.
I'm really, really tempted to rent Alone In The Dark. Is it that bad?
Oh, and your wrestlers in films theory is pure rubbish: Rowdy Roddy Piper in 'They Live', anyone?
Oh, and your wrestlers in films theory is pure rubbish: Rowdy Roddy Piper in 'They Live', anyone?
Lets face it, it has a wrestler as the star.
I doubt we're heading into Kubrick territory with this one. I expect reviews to be the typical "3/10 - ** - 40%" area.
If it's anything higher, I'll laugh and still not watch it.
I doubt we're heading into Kubrick territory with this one. I expect reviews to be the typical "3/10 - ** - 40%" area.
If it's anything higher, I'll laugh and still not watch it.
Time_Warp wrote:
> This film looks super cool and original...
Ahahahhahaaa. No, it looks like Aliens. But a low budget pg-13 version.
> This film looks super cool and original...
Ahahahhahaaa. No, it looks like Aliens. But a low budget pg-13 version.
Those screenies do worry me. Although the fact that they removed the Hell element had me fretting enough already.
Page: