Viewing Thread:
"Third age."

Good? Worth the full amount? Too quick to be finished? Too easy?

Hedfix wrote:
> Heh. I meant my post not the review. :D



ah stupidity maximus :P

Heh. I meant my post not the review. :D

Hedfix wrote:
> ah, it was meant to be read in many different ways.
>
> You chose one.
>
> Now go back and read it again.


cant be arsed my insider ran out beginning of november :P

ah, it was meant to be read in many different ways.

You chose one.

Now go back and read it again.

Hedfix wrote:
> IGN spent 90% of the review pointing out all the game's flaws then
> awarded it a high mark for still being a good game.
>
> Looks like they're back on form then.

the fact of the matter is at least ign do point out that the game can still be immense fun even with some of the flaws. Thats how I saw it anyways.

IGN spent 90% of the review pointing out all the game's flaws then awarded it a high mark for still being a good game.

Looks like they're back on form then.

Crumble wrote:
> The reviews aren't looking too promising.
>
> IGN gave it 8.4, but then most magazines/sites I've read have only
> given 5-6/10.
>
> So, not looking to amazing.


what did ign say was good about them. I trust ign's reviews most of the time.

I'll get it...

LOTR meets RPG - WONDERFUL...

The reviews aren't looking too promising.

IGN gave it 8.4, but then most magazines/sites I've read have only given 5-6/10.

So, not looking to amazing.

Looks OK from what I've seen but I'd have to read some reviews before I even consider buying.