Viewing Thread:
"Should we merge the FOGs?"

Straight yes/no answer. Absolutely no chatting. Just yes or no. OK?

Just yes or no.

I will post my vote:

Yes.

Like that. No chatting. Yes/no.

NO!

This way it keeps all the junk out of the way!!

So it does, so it does!!

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO....*breath*O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO... etc etc

:-)

I say no. Simply because I wouldn't see the point of coming here if there wasn't the chat and arguements.

I am the tarrents tagline is:

What is Hip?

Hip is one side of the pelvis

:-D

NO.

I say NO.

I like the FOG bridge. It has become my friend and I don't think I could handle it being taken away now!

I have to say, I am getting used to the two FOG's now. I am actually starting to like it!

Tony clearly said yesterday that he would let this run for a few weeks, its needs a test and at the moment it is working, sometimes the 'chatter' is doing better than the prime topics....

so I will not say Yes/No just:

SIOHDJIOHOSLJD

yep thats my anser!

No.

I need to make this clear what I'm saying:

NO! we should not re-merge the FOG Forums, they are better like this.