The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I am adding more to the website and I was wondring what you lot know about satanism or if you are a Satanist the you might be able to give me some info.
I am not a Satanist!!
I am not a Satanist!!
Page:
There's nothing wrong with a little murder now and again - wait...there is?
Timmargh pwns.
Lots of people wrote:
> Timmargh said something that was technically wrong.
I know it was wrong (technically), but you have to make sacrifices for humour sometimes.
Preferably virgins.
> Timmargh said something that was technically wrong.
I know it was wrong (technically), but you have to make sacrifices for humour sometimes.
Preferably virgins.
www.churchofsatan.com
Yes, if for the purposes of the joke you agree that religion is lame. You can still have degrees of lameness.
smv wrote:
> The lame part is already implied by religion.
>
> That's if Timmargh's teaching is up to scratch.
It's still stupid.
It's like saying "He's the gayest homo ever"
It just emphasises it.
because it's not repirition (EDIT: What the hell is repirition!!? Repetition, even), really.
If you said "It's a lame religion" then that would be tautology.
I think.
> The lame part is already implied by religion.
>
> That's if Timmargh's teaching is up to scratch.
It's still stupid.
It's like saying "He's the gayest homo ever"
It just emphasises it.
because it's not repirition (EDIT: What the hell is repirition!!? Repetition, even), really.
If you said "It's a lame religion" then that would be tautology.
I think.
smv wrote:
> The lame part is already implied by religion.
>
> That's if Timmargh's teaching is up to scratch.
Oh, I see, it was humour.
> The lame part is already implied by religion.
>
> That's if Timmargh's teaching is up to scratch.
Oh, I see, it was humour.
Timmargh wrote:
> tau · tol · o · gy
> a. Needless repetition of the same sense in different words;
> redundancy.
> b. An instance of such repetition.
In other words, like an episode of Hollyoaks. Right?
> tau · tol · o · gy
> a. Needless repetition of the same sense in different words;
> redundancy.
> b. An instance of such repetition.
In other words, like an episode of Hollyoaks. Right?
The lame part is already implied by religion.
That's if Timmargh's teaching is up to scratch.
That's if Timmargh's teaching is up to scratch.
I don't see how what SMV said is a tautology.
Page: